Heli Tuppurainen, Sara Määttä, Mervi Könönen, Petro Julkunen, Hannu Kautiainen, Soile Hyvärinen, Olli Vaurio, Mikko Joensuu, Matti Vanhanen, Kati Aho-Mustonen, Esa Mervaala, Jari Tiihonen
{"title":"Navigated and individual α-peak-frequency-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation in male patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia.","authors":"Heli Tuppurainen, Sara Määttä, Mervi Könönen, Petro Julkunen, Hannu Kautiainen, Soile Hyvärinen, Olli Vaurio, Mikko Joensuu, Matti Vanhanen, Kati Aho-Mustonen, Esa Mervaala, Jari Tiihonen","doi":"10.1503/jpn.230063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have indicated altered brain oscillatory α-band activity in schizophrenia, and treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using individualized α-frequency has shown therapeutic effects. Magnetic resonance imaging-based neuronavigation methods allow stimulation of a specific cortical region and improve targeting of rTMS; therefore, we sought to study the efficacy of navigated, individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS (αTMS) on treatment-refractory schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited medication-refractory male patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in this doubleblind, sham-controlled study. We randomized patients to a 3-week course of either active αTMS or sham stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We assessed participants with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) at baseline and after treatment. We conducted a follow-up assessment with the PANSS 3 months after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 44 patients. After treatment, we observed a significantly higher PANSS total score (<i>p</i> = 0.029), PANSS general psychopathology score (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and PANSS 5-factor model cognitive-disorganized factor score (<i>p</i> = 0.011) in the αTMS group than the sham group. In addition, the CGI-Improvement score was significantly higher among those who received αTMS compared with sham stimulation (<i>p</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The limited number of study participants included only male patients. Depression was not formally evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Navigated αTMS to the left DLPFC reduced total, general psychopathological, and cognitive-disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia. These results provide evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT01941251; ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"49 2","pages":"E87-E95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have indicated altered brain oscillatory α-band activity in schizophrenia, and treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using individualized α-frequency has shown therapeutic effects. Magnetic resonance imaging-based neuronavigation methods allow stimulation of a specific cortical region and improve targeting of rTMS; therefore, we sought to study the efficacy of navigated, individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS (αTMS) on treatment-refractory schizophrenia.
Methods: We recruited medication-refractory male patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in this doubleblind, sham-controlled study. We randomized patients to a 3-week course of either active αTMS or sham stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We assessed participants with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) at baseline and after treatment. We conducted a follow-up assessment with the PANSS 3 months after intervention.
Results: We included 44 patients. After treatment, we observed a significantly higher PANSS total score (p = 0.029), PANSS general psychopathology score (p = 0.027) and PANSS 5-factor model cognitive-disorganized factor score (p = 0.011) in the αTMS group than the sham group. In addition, the CGI-Improvement score was significantly higher among those who received αTMS compared with sham stimulation (p = 0.048).
Limitations: The limited number of study participants included only male patients. Depression was not formally evaluated.
Conclusion: Navigated αTMS to the left DLPFC reduced total, general psychopathological, and cognitive-disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia. These results provide evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of individual α-peak-frequency-guided rTMS in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
