(Not) showing you feel good, can be bad: The consequences of breaking expressivity norms for positive emotions

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104600
Kunalan Manokara , Alisa Balabanova , Mirna Đurić , Agneta H. Fischer , Disa A. Sauter
{"title":"(Not) showing you feel good, can be bad: The consequences of breaking expressivity norms for positive emotions","authors":"Kunalan Manokara ,&nbsp;Alisa Balabanova ,&nbsp;Mirna Đurić ,&nbsp;Agneta H. Fischer ,&nbsp;Disa A. Sauter","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Are there optimal levels of showing one feels good? Examining four positive emotions (<em>gratitude, interest, feeling moved, triumph</em>), we demonstrate in two pre-registered experiments (<em>n</em> = 901) that even for pleasant feelings, showing too much – or too little – can lead to negative social consequences. Expressers who downplay their gratitude, and to a lesser degree interest, are deprived of social contact and power. Restrained displays of feeling moved are also met with reduced contact. For triumph, amplified expressers are socially avoided, yet at the same time, those who downplay their victory are seen to be less powerful. We demonstrate the role of person-perception mechanisms (warmth and competence) as underlying explanators for these effects. Taken together, our findings contribute to the growing literature on the social consequences of emotional expressions, by pointing to divergent outcomes for norm violations relating to different positive emotions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 104600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312400012X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Are there optimal levels of showing one feels good? Examining four positive emotions (gratitude, interest, feeling moved, triumph), we demonstrate in two pre-registered experiments (n = 901) that even for pleasant feelings, showing too much – or too little – can lead to negative social consequences. Expressers who downplay their gratitude, and to a lesser degree interest, are deprived of social contact and power. Restrained displays of feeling moved are also met with reduced contact. For triumph, amplified expressers are socially avoided, yet at the same time, those who downplay their victory are seen to be less powerful. We demonstrate the role of person-perception mechanisms (warmth and competence) as underlying explanators for these effects. Taken together, our findings contribute to the growing literature on the social consequences of emotional expressions, by pointing to divergent outcomes for norm violations relating to different positive emotions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(不)表现出你感觉良好,可能是坏事:打破积极情绪表达规范的后果
是否存在表现自己感觉良好的最佳水平?通过对四种积极情绪(感激、兴趣、感动、胜利)的研究,我们在两个预先登记的实验(n = 901)中证明,即使是愉快的情绪,表现得太多或太少都会导致负面的社会后果。淡化感激之情(其次是兴趣)的表达者会被剥夺社会接触和权力。克制地表达感动也会减少与他人的接触。对于胜利,夸张的表达者会被社会回避,但与此同时,那些淡化自己胜利的人也会被认为没有那么强大。我们证明了人的感知机制(温暖和能力)对这些效应的潜在解释作用。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,与不同的积极情绪相关的违反规范行为会产生不同的结果,从而为越来越多关于情绪表达的社会后果的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
期刊最新文献
Empathic listening satisfies speakers' psychological needs and well-being, but doesn't directly deepen solitude experiences: A registered report “Black-and-White” thinking: Does visual contrast polarize moral judgment? Independent replications and extension of Study 1 Ideological beliefs as cues to exploitation-exploration behavior Consume humanity: Eating anthropomorphic food leads to the dehumanization of others Women underrepresented or men overrepresented? Framing influences women's affective and behavioral responses to gender gap in political leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1