Building resilience to misinformation in communities of color: Results from two studies of tailored digital media literacy interventions

IF 4.5 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION New Media & Society Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1177/14614448241227841
Angela Y Lee, Ryan C Moore, Jeffrey T Hancock
{"title":"Building resilience to misinformation in communities of color: Results from two studies of tailored digital media literacy interventions","authors":"Angela Y Lee, Ryan C Moore, Jeffrey T Hancock","doi":"10.1177/14614448241227841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interventions to build resilience to misinformation should consider the needs of communities of color, who experience (mis)information in unique ways. We evaluated digital media literacy interventions to improve misinformation resilience among four communities of color in the United States (Black, Latino, Asian American/Pacific Islander, Native American), which were designed by the nonprofit PEN America and community partner organizations. We assessed intervention efficacy in two studies: (1) a quasi-experimental field study among diverse participants recruited via community outreach and (2) a randomized controlled trial among Latinos recruited via a survey company (total N = 370). Results indicated that participants in both studies improved their comprehension of digital media literacy skills after taking the intervention. However, only those recruited via community outreach improved their ability to accurately identify true and false online news in a behavioral detection task. Our findings highlight the need to consider heterogeneous treatment effects in misinformation interventions, particularly across different communities and intervention contexts.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241227841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions to build resilience to misinformation should consider the needs of communities of color, who experience (mis)information in unique ways. We evaluated digital media literacy interventions to improve misinformation resilience among four communities of color in the United States (Black, Latino, Asian American/Pacific Islander, Native American), which were designed by the nonprofit PEN America and community partner organizations. We assessed intervention efficacy in two studies: (1) a quasi-experimental field study among diverse participants recruited via community outreach and (2) a randomized controlled trial among Latinos recruited via a survey company (total N = 370). Results indicated that participants in both studies improved their comprehension of digital media literacy skills after taking the intervention. However, only those recruited via community outreach improved their ability to accurately identify true and false online news in a behavioral detection task. Our findings highlight the need to consider heterogeneous treatment effects in misinformation interventions, particularly across different communities and intervention contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有色人种社区培养抵御错误信息的能力:对量身定制的数字媒体扫盲干预措施进行的两项研究的结果
培养抵御错误信息能力的干预措施应考虑有色人种的需求,他们以独特的方式经历(错误)信息。我们评估了旨在提高美国四个有色人种(黑人、拉丁裔、亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民、美国原住民)抵御错误信息能力的数字媒体素养干预措施,这些干预措施是由非营利组织美国笔会和社区伙伴组织设计的。我们在两项研究中对干预效果进行了评估:(1) 在通过社区外展活动招募的不同参与者中进行的准实验性实地研究;(2) 在通过调查公司招募的拉美人中进行的随机对照试验(总人数 = 370)。结果表明,两项研究的参与者在接受干预后都提高了对数字媒体素养技能的理解能力。然而,只有那些通过社区宣传招募的参与者在行为检测任务中提高了准确识别真假网络新闻的能力。我们的研究结果凸显了在误导信息干预中考虑异质性治疗效果的必要性,尤其是在不同社区和干预背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Media & Society
New Media & Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: New Media & Society engages in critical discussions of the key issues arising from the scale and speed of new media development, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and on both theoretical and empirical research. The journal includes contributions on: -the individual and the social, the cultural and the political dimensions of new media -the global and local dimensions of the relationship between media and social change -contemporary as well as historical developments -the implications and impacts of, as well as the determinants and obstacles to, media change the relationship between theory, policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
The psychology of volunteer moderators: Tradeoffs between participation, belonging, and norms in online community governance Faking, optimising and conceding to power: Social movement understandings of social media power A scoping review of studies on self-tracking for weight management: Social contexts and experiences of a practice Being and becoming in the culture of immediacy: An existential-ethical approach Opportunity structures for user acceptance of news recommender systems (NRS): A multi-country survey study of relationships between individual-level factors and evaluations of NRS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1