Medical assistance in dying for mental illness: a complex intervention requiring a correspondingly complex evaluation approach.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1192/bjp.2024.21
Hamer Bastidas-Bilbao, David Castle, Mona Gupta, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa D Hawke
{"title":"Medical assistance in dying for mental illness: a complex intervention requiring a correspondingly complex evaluation approach.","authors":"Hamer Bastidas-Bilbao, David Castle, Mona Gupta, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa D Hawke","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical assistance in dying for mental illness as a sole underlying medical condition (MAiD MI-SUMC) is a controversial and complex policy in terms of psychosocial and ethical medical practice implications. We discuss the status of MAiD MI-SUMC in Canada and argue for the use of the UK Medical Research Council's framework on complex interventions in programme evaluations of MAiD MI-SUMC. It is imperative to carefully and rigorously evaluate the implementation of MAiD MI-SUMC to ensure an understanding of the multiple facets of implementation in contexts permeated by unique social, economic, cultural and historical influences, with a correspondingly diverse array of outcomes. This requires a complexity-informed programme evaluation focused on context-dependent mechanisms and stakeholder experiences, including patients, service providers and other people affected by the policy. It is also important to consider the economic impact on health and social welfare systems. Such evaluations can provide the data needed to guide evidence-informed decision-making that can contribute to safer implementation and refinement of MAiD MI-SUMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"264-267"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.21","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical assistance in dying for mental illness as a sole underlying medical condition (MAiD MI-SUMC) is a controversial and complex policy in terms of psychosocial and ethical medical practice implications. We discuss the status of MAiD MI-SUMC in Canada and argue for the use of the UK Medical Research Council's framework on complex interventions in programme evaluations of MAiD MI-SUMC. It is imperative to carefully and rigorously evaluate the implementation of MAiD MI-SUMC to ensure an understanding of the multiple facets of implementation in contexts permeated by unique social, economic, cultural and historical influences, with a correspondingly diverse array of outcomes. This requires a complexity-informed programme evaluation focused on context-dependent mechanisms and stakeholder experiences, including patients, service providers and other people affected by the policy. It is also important to consider the economic impact on health and social welfare systems. Such evaluations can provide the data needed to guide evidence-informed decision-making that can contribute to safer implementation and refinement of MAiD MI-SUMC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病患者的临终医疗救助:一种复杂的干预措施,需要相应复杂的评估方法。
作为唯一潜在病症的精神疾病的临终医疗协助(MAiD MI-SUMC)是一项在社会心理和伦理医疗实践影响方面具有争议性和复杂性的政策。我们讨论了加拿大对作为唯一基础医疗条件的精神疾病的临终关怀的现状,并主张在对作为唯一基础医疗条件的精神疾病的临终关怀进行项目评估时使用英国医学研究委员会的复杂干预框架。当务之急是仔细、严格地评估多元智能-社区多媒体中心的实施情况,以确保了解在受独特的社会、经济、文化和历史影响的背景下实施的多方面情况,以及相应的一系列不同结果。这就要求对计划的复杂性进行知情评估,重点关注与具体情况相关的机制和利益相关者的经验,包括患者、服务提供者和其他受政策影响的人。考虑对卫生和社会福利系统的经济影响也很重要。此类评估可提供必要的数据,指导有实证依据的决策,从而有助于更安全地实施和完善千年发展目标多边医疗谅解备忘录(MAiD MI-SUMC)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
期刊最新文献
Psychological framework to understand interpersonal violence by forensic patients with psychosis: commentary, Huang & Wei. Dosage effects of psychodynamic and schema therapy in people with comorbid depression and personality disorder: four-arm pragmatic randomised controlled trial: commentary, Mulder. Disease trajectories before dementia: evidence from a large-scale community-based prospective study. Detection of suicidality from medical text using privacy-preserving large language models. Alias Grace - Psychiatry in television.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1