Empirisch abgeleitete Empfehlungen für den Auf- und Ausbau von Tageshospizen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung mit Expert:innen

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.002
Stephanie Stiel , Alexandra Ernst , Hanna A.A. Röwer , Lea de Jong , Birte Burger , Nils Schneider , Kathrin Damm , Jona T. Stahmeyer , Beate Apolinarski , Franziska A. Herbst
{"title":"Empirisch abgeleitete Empfehlungen für den Auf- und Ausbau von Tageshospizen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung mit Expert:innen","authors":"Stephanie Stiel ,&nbsp;Alexandra Ernst ,&nbsp;Hanna A.A. Röwer ,&nbsp;Lea de Jong ,&nbsp;Birte Burger ,&nbsp;Nils Schneider ,&nbsp;Kathrin Damm ,&nbsp;Jona T. Stahmeyer ,&nbsp;Beate Apolinarski ,&nbsp;Franziska A. Herbst","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A needs-based and patient-oriented hospice and palliative care also includes day hospices as a specialised semi-inpatient care offer. The establishment and development of these facilities in Germany has been rather unsystematic. In order to ensure quality and adequacy of these structures, research is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Delphi consensus study was conducted online from November 2022 to February 2023 aiming at generating recommendations for the development and expansion of day hospices in Germany. For each recommendation, the participants indicated on a four-point verbal rating scale how much they agreed upon a) the relevance and b) the feasibility of the recommendation. Items were considered consented when 80<!--> <!-->% of the participants (strongly) agreed with the recommendation regarding both criteria. If no consensus was reached, the recommendations were revised according to the participants’ free text comments and presented in the next Delphi round. Descriptive analyses were applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 64 experts participated in the first Delphi round and 44 in the second. In round 1, 34 recommendations and in round 2 six recommendations were consented. The final set contains a total of 40 recommendations: 18 on the tasks of day hospices, 13 on cooperation, 7 on funding, and 2 on public relations.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Recommendations for the development and expansion of day hospices in Germany were developed. Due to their highly rated feasibility, the recommendations should be directly transferable into care practice. It remains to be seen to what extent they will be taken into account in the renegotiation of the framework agreement for day hospices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Delphi-consented recommendations provide a basis to guide action in the currently very dynamic development of hospice work and palliative care in Germany.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000084/pdfft?md5=d6eea13518f4390fb675717f49df3a4b&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000084-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A needs-based and patient-oriented hospice and palliative care also includes day hospices as a specialised semi-inpatient care offer. The establishment and development of these facilities in Germany has been rather unsystematic. In order to ensure quality and adequacy of these structures, research is needed.

Methods

A Delphi consensus study was conducted online from November 2022 to February 2023 aiming at generating recommendations for the development and expansion of day hospices in Germany. For each recommendation, the participants indicated on a four-point verbal rating scale how much they agreed upon a) the relevance and b) the feasibility of the recommendation. Items were considered consented when 80 % of the participants (strongly) agreed with the recommendation regarding both criteria. If no consensus was reached, the recommendations were revised according to the participants’ free text comments and presented in the next Delphi round. Descriptive analyses were applied.

Results

A total of 64 experts participated in the first Delphi round and 44 in the second. In round 1, 34 recommendations and in round 2 six recommendations were consented. The final set contains a total of 40 recommendations: 18 on the tasks of day hospices, 13 on cooperation, 7 on funding, and 2 on public relations.

Discussion

Recommendations for the development and expansion of day hospices in Germany were developed. Due to their highly rated feasibility, the recommendations should be directly transferable into care practice. It remains to be seen to what extent they will be taken into account in the renegotiation of the framework agreement for day hospices.

Conclusion

The Delphi-consented recommendations provide a basis to guide action in the currently very dynamic development of hospice work and palliative care in Germany.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关于在德国发展和扩大日间临终关怀机构的经验性建议--德尔菲专家小组讨论的结果]。
导言:以需求为基础、以病人为导向的临终关怀和姑息治疗也包括日间临终关怀,作为一种专门的半住院治疗服务。这些机构在德国的建立和发展并不系统。为了确保这些机构的质量和适当性,需要进行研究:方法:2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月在网上进行了德尔菲共识研究,旨在为德国日间临终关怀机构的发展和扩张提出建议。对于每项建议,参与者通过四点口头评分表来表明他们对 a) 建议的相关性和 b) 建议的可行性的认同程度。如果 80% 的参与者(非常同意)该建议的两个标准,则视为同意该建议。如果未达成一致意见,则根据参与者的自由文本评论对建议进行修订,并在下一轮德尔菲会议中提出。对结果进行了描述性分析:共有 64 名专家参加了第一轮德尔菲讨论,44 名专家参加了第二轮德尔菲讨论。第一轮有 34 项建议获得同意,第二轮有 6 项建议获得同意。最后一套共包含 40 项建议:其中 18 项涉及日间临终关怀机构的任务,13 项涉及合作,7 项涉及资金,2 项涉及公共关系:讨论:为日间临终关怀机构在德国的发展和扩张提出了建议。这些建议具有很高的可行性,可以直接应用到护理实践中。这些建议在多大程度上会在日间临终关怀机构框架协议的重新谈判中得到考虑,还有待观察:德尔菲共识建议为指导德国临终关怀工作和姑息关怀的动态发展提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1