Resuscitating the macro- vs. microcirculation in septic shock.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Current opinion in pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1097/MOP.0000000000001345
Rafael González, Javier Urbano, Jesús López-Herce
{"title":"Resuscitating the macro- vs. microcirculation in septic shock.","authors":"Rafael González, Javier Urbano, Jesús López-Herce","doi":"10.1097/MOP.0000000000001345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review summarizes current literature about the relationships between macro and microcirculation and their practical clinical implications in children with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence from experimental and clinical observational studies in children and adults with septic shock reveals that the response to treatment and resuscitation is widely variable. Furthermore, there is a loss of hemodynamic coherence, as resuscitation-induced improvement in macrocirculation (systemic hemodynamic parameters) does not necessarily result in a parallel improvement in the microcirculation. Therefore, patient-tailored monitoring is essential in order to adjust treatment requirements during resuscitation in septic shock. Optimal monitoring must integrate macrocirculation (heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac output, and ultrasound images), microcirculation (videomicroscopy parameters and capillary refill time) and cellular metabolism (lactic acid, central venous blood oxygen saturation, and difference of central venous to arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a dire need for high-quality studies to assess the relationships between macrocirculation, microcirculation and tissue metabolism in children with septic shock. The development of reliable and readily available microcirculation and tissue perfusion biomarkers (other than lactic acid) is also necessary to improve monitoring and treatment adjustment in such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10985,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review summarizes current literature about the relationships between macro and microcirculation and their practical clinical implications in children with septic shock.

Recent findings: Current evidence from experimental and clinical observational studies in children and adults with septic shock reveals that the response to treatment and resuscitation is widely variable. Furthermore, there is a loss of hemodynamic coherence, as resuscitation-induced improvement in macrocirculation (systemic hemodynamic parameters) does not necessarily result in a parallel improvement in the microcirculation. Therefore, patient-tailored monitoring is essential in order to adjust treatment requirements during resuscitation in septic shock. Optimal monitoring must integrate macrocirculation (heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac output, and ultrasound images), microcirculation (videomicroscopy parameters and capillary refill time) and cellular metabolism (lactic acid, central venous blood oxygen saturation, and difference of central venous to arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure).

Summary: There is a dire need for high-quality studies to assess the relationships between macrocirculation, microcirculation and tissue metabolism in children with septic shock. The development of reliable and readily available microcirculation and tissue perfusion biomarkers (other than lactic acid) is also necessary to improve monitoring and treatment adjustment in such patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抢救脓毒性休克的大循环与微循环。
综述的目的:本综述总结了目前有关脓毒性休克患儿大循环和微循环之间的关系及其实际临床意义的文献:最近的研究结果:对脓毒性休克患儿和成人进行的实验和临床观察研究表明,治疗和复苏的反应千差万别。此外,由于复苏引起的大循环(全身血液动力学参数)改善并不一定导致微循环的同步改善,因此血液动力学失去了连贯性。因此,为了在脓毒性休克患者复苏期间调整治疗要求,针对患者的监测至关重要。最佳监测必须整合大循环(心率、血压、心输出量和超声图像)、微循环(视频显微镜参数和毛细血管再充盈时间)和细胞代谢(乳酸、中心静脉血氧饱和度和中心静脉与动脉二氧化碳分压差)。此外,还需要开发可靠且易于使用的微循环和组织灌注生物标志物(乳酸除外),以改善对此类患者的监测和治疗调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Current Opinion in Pediatrics is a reader-friendly resource which allows the reader to keep up-to-date with the most important advances in the pediatric field. Each issue of Current Opinion in Pediatrics contains three main sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive cover of all key issues related to pediatrics; including genetics, therapeutics and toxicology, adolescent medicine, neonatology and perinatology, and orthopedics. Unique to Current Opinion in Pediatrics is the office pediatrics section which appears in every issue and covers popular topics such as fever, immunization and ADHD. Current Opinion in Pediatrics is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
期刊最新文献
Blenderized tube feeding in pediatrics - current evidence, guidelines, and considerations. Novel and complementary treatment approaches in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Optimizing management of chronic pulmonary hypertension in preterm infants: strategies for a complex population. Pearls for practice from the 2023 allergy immunology joint task force on practice parameters GRADE and institute of medicine based atopic dermatitis guidelines. What's new in pediatric genetic cholestatic liver disease: advances in etiology, diagnostics and therapeutic approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1