Hybrid robotic-assisted coronary revascularization and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Invasive Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.25270/jic/23.00308
Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Serge Sicouri, Gianluca Torregrossa, William A Gray, Francis P Sutter, Basel Ramlawi
{"title":"Hybrid robotic-assisted coronary revascularization and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Serge Sicouri, Gianluca Torregrossa, William A Gray, Francis P Sutter, Basel Ramlawi","doi":"10.25270/jic/23.00308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The efficacy of hybrid robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for coronary and aortic valve disease is poorly reported. Herein, we report our experience with this hybrid approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2018 and June 2022, 10 (7 male, 3 female) patients with a mean age of 81 years underwent the hybrid procedure. Coronary revascularization was performed prior to TAVR with robotic-assisted left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending (LAD) bypass grafting for left main or proximal LAD lesions with or without multivessel disease with or without hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients had left main disease, and 5 had proximal LAD disease with or without multivessel disease. All patients tolerated the robotic-assisted CABG procedure well; 9 patients were extubated in the operating room and all patients were ambulatory on postoperative day 1. Five patients underwent hybrid PCI for non-LAD lesions. TAVR was subsequently performed at intervals ranging from 3 days to 5 months after CABG. One patient with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis required hospitalization for heart failure during the interval period. The 1-year mortality rate was 0%, and 3 patients died during late follow-up (24-43 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This innovative, less invasive approach demonstrates the potential for early recovery in appropriately selected patients with complex coronary and aortic valve disease with promising mid-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/23.00308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The efficacy of hybrid robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for coronary and aortic valve disease is poorly reported. Herein, we report our experience with this hybrid approach.

Methods: Between January 2018 and June 2022, 10 (7 male, 3 female) patients with a mean age of 81 years underwent the hybrid procedure. Coronary revascularization was performed prior to TAVR with robotic-assisted left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending (LAD) bypass grafting for left main or proximal LAD lesions with or without multivessel disease with or without hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Results: Five patients had left main disease, and 5 had proximal LAD disease with or without multivessel disease. All patients tolerated the robotic-assisted CABG procedure well; 9 patients were extubated in the operating room and all patients were ambulatory on postoperative day 1. Five patients underwent hybrid PCI for non-LAD lesions. TAVR was subsequently performed at intervals ranging from 3 days to 5 months after CABG. One patient with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis required hospitalization for heart failure during the interval period. The 1-year mortality rate was 0%, and 3 patients died during late follow-up (24-43 months).

Conclusions: This innovative, less invasive approach demonstrates the potential for early recovery in appropriately selected patients with complex coronary and aortic valve disease with promising mid-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合机器人辅助冠状动脉血运重建和经导管主动脉瓣置换术:单中心经验。
目的:机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗冠状动脉和主动脉瓣疾病的疗效鲜有报道。在此,我们报告了我们采用这种混合方法的经验:2018年1月至2022年6月期间,10名(7男3女)平均年龄81岁的患者接受了混合手术。在进行TAVR之前,对伴有或不伴有多血管疾病的左主干或左主干近端病变进行了机器人辅助的左乳内动脉至左前降支(LAD)旁路移植术,同时进行或不进行混合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):5名患者为左主干病变,5名患者为伴有或不伴有多支血管病变的LAD近端病变。所有患者对机器人辅助 CABG 手术的耐受性良好;9 名患者在手术室拔管,所有患者在术后第 1 天均可下床活动。五名患者因非 LAD 病变接受了混合 PCI。随后,在 CABG 术后 3 天到 5 个月之间进行了 TAVR。一名患有终末期肾病并接受血液透析的患者在间隔期间因心力衰竭需要住院治疗。1年死亡率为0%,3名患者在后期随访期间(24-43个月)死亡:结论:这种创新的微创方法证明,经过适当选择的复杂冠状动脉和主动脉瓣疾病患者有可能实现早期康复,并取得良好的中期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
期刊最新文献
Giant traumatic external iliac artery-femoral arteriovenous fistula. Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and cerebral amyloid angiopathy: insights from the LOGIC (Left atrial appendage Occlusion in patients with Gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) international multicenter registry. A precise endomyocardial biopsy method guided by the electroanatomical mapping system. Cardiac rupture following myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of coronary complications of percutaneous coronary interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1