Advancing the democratization of work: A new intellectual history of transformational leadership theory

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Leadership Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1177/17427150241232705
Lauren Eaton, Todd Bridgman, Stephen Cummings
{"title":"Advancing the democratization of work: A new intellectual history of transformational leadership theory","authors":"Lauren Eaton, Todd Bridgman, Stephen Cummings","doi":"10.1177/17427150241232705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amidst growing demands for more democratic forms of organizing, we argue that better understanding the origins of transformational leadership theory offers a way forward. Transformational leadership theory, originally developed by American political scientist James MacGregor Burns in the late 1970s, is the best-known and most influential leadership theory in management studies. Transformational leaders are visionaries who engage with followers’ higher-level needs and inspire them to deliver extraordinary outcomes for their organizations. Democracy was at the core of Burns’ conception of transformational leadership: voters selected their leaders and voted them out if they failed to deliver on their visions. However, this was overlooked by those who introduced the theory to management studies. Using intellectual history, we contrast the conventional representation of transformational leadership theory in business with Burns’ original conception. We explore how and why the democratic foundation of the theory was lost, why this matters, and what can be done to recover it.","PeriodicalId":47422,"journal":{"name":"Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150241232705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amidst growing demands for more democratic forms of organizing, we argue that better understanding the origins of transformational leadership theory offers a way forward. Transformational leadership theory, originally developed by American political scientist James MacGregor Burns in the late 1970s, is the best-known and most influential leadership theory in management studies. Transformational leaders are visionaries who engage with followers’ higher-level needs and inspire them to deliver extraordinary outcomes for their organizations. Democracy was at the core of Burns’ conception of transformational leadership: voters selected their leaders and voted them out if they failed to deliver on their visions. However, this was overlooked by those who introduced the theory to management studies. Using intellectual history, we contrast the conventional representation of transformational leadership theory in business with Burns’ original conception. We explore how and why the democratic foundation of the theory was lost, why this matters, and what can be done to recover it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进工作民主化:变革型领导力理论的新思想史
在对更民主的组织形式的需求日益增长的情况下,我们认为,更好地理解变革型领导理论的起源将为我们提供一条前进的道路。变革型领导理论最初由美国政治学家詹姆斯-麦克格雷格-伯恩斯(James MacGregor Burns)于 20 世纪 70 年代末提出,是管理研究领域最著名、最具影响力的领导理论。变革型领导者是具有远见卓识的人,他们能够满足追随者更高层次的需求,并激励他们为组织带来非凡的成果。民主是伯恩斯变革型领导概念的核心:选民选择他们的领导者,如果领导者不能实现自己的愿景,选民就会将其淘汰出局。然而,将这一理论引入管理学研究的人却忽略了这一点。我们利用思想史,将变革型领导理论在企业中的传统表述与伯恩斯的原始概念进行对比。我们探讨了这一理论的民主基础是如何丧失的、为什么会丧失,以及如何才能恢复这一基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leadership
Leadership MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
23.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Leadership is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on leadership. Leadership is designed to provide an ongoing forum for academic researchers to exchange information, insights and knowledge on both theoretical development and empirical research on leadership. It will publish original, high-quality articles that contribute to the advancement of the field of leadership studies.
期刊最新文献
Can a leader be authentic and cruel? What happens when a vice becomes a virtue When atypical leaders fail to deliver allyship for diversity: The case of an unregulated neoliberal national context Rhetoric as resistance leadership in the ‘buen vivir’ global movement: Framing on social media collective utopias inspired by nature to challenge the status quo Bad leadership - Why we steer clear The leaderlessness conundrum: Politics and anti-politics in global justice movements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1