Fear of Progression and Resilience as Mediators of the Association between Family Function and Quality of Life among Patients with Cervical Cancer

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES European Journal of Cancer Care Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1155/2024/1145993
Chuntao Wang, Yaling Wang, Fan Wu, Jiling Qu, Qiuyi Wang, Pornpat Hengudomsub, Chintana Wacharasin, Lanshu Zhou
{"title":"Fear of Progression and Resilience as Mediators of the Association between Family Function and Quality of Life among Patients with Cervical Cancer","authors":"Chuntao Wang,&nbsp;Yaling Wang,&nbsp;Fan Wu,&nbsp;Jiling Qu,&nbsp;Qiuyi Wang,&nbsp;Pornpat Hengudomsub,&nbsp;Chintana Wacharasin,&nbsp;Lanshu Zhou","doi":"10.1155/2024/1145993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Objective</i>. To explore the impact of family function on quality of life (QoL) and investigate the mediating effects of fear of progression (FoP) and resilience in the pathway from family function to QoL among patients with cervical cancer (CC). <i>Methods</i>. A multicenter cross-sectional survey with convenience sampling was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022. A total of 252 patients with cervical cancer were recruited from five tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China. Patients completed the 5-item self-administered Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve (APGAR) scale, the Fear of Progress Questionnaire short-form, the 14-item Resilience Scale, and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to explore the mediation effect of FoP and resilience between family function and QoL for CC patients. Bootstrapping procedures were used to verify the significance of the indirect effects of the mediating variables. <i>Results</i>. The mean score of family function was 7.97 ± 2.41 (scale range: 0–10), FoP was 29.58 ± 10.14 (scale range: 12–60), and resilience was 69.37 ± 14.36 (scale range: 14–98). The mean score for physical component summary (PCS) was 41.87 ± 10.00 (scale range: 0–100), and the mean score for mental component summary (MCS) was 46.68 ± 11.78 (scale range: 0–100). Family function positively predicted patients’ resilience and negatively predicted their FoP, while FoP negatively predicted CC patients’ resilience and QoL, and resilience positively predicted patients’ QoL. Patients’ family function was associated with their QoL directly and indirectly through the mediation of FoP and resilience, and the model explained 7% of the variation in FoP, 24% of the variation in resilience, and 42% of the variation in QoL. <i>Conclusions</i>. Chinese CC patients expressed poor QoL. FoP and resilience could mediate the association between patients’ family function and QoL. Healthcare professionals could improve QoL of patients with cervical cancer through reducing FoP and enhancing resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1145993","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To explore the impact of family function on quality of life (QoL) and investigate the mediating effects of fear of progression (FoP) and resilience in the pathway from family function to QoL among patients with cervical cancer (CC). Methods. A multicenter cross-sectional survey with convenience sampling was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022. A total of 252 patients with cervical cancer were recruited from five tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China. Patients completed the 5-item self-administered Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve (APGAR) scale, the Fear of Progress Questionnaire short-form, the 14-item Resilience Scale, and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to explore the mediation effect of FoP and resilience between family function and QoL for CC patients. Bootstrapping procedures were used to verify the significance of the indirect effects of the mediating variables. Results. The mean score of family function was 7.97 ± 2.41 (scale range: 0–10), FoP was 29.58 ± 10.14 (scale range: 12–60), and resilience was 69.37 ± 14.36 (scale range: 14–98). The mean score for physical component summary (PCS) was 41.87 ± 10.00 (scale range: 0–100), and the mean score for mental component summary (MCS) was 46.68 ± 11.78 (scale range: 0–100). Family function positively predicted patients’ resilience and negatively predicted their FoP, while FoP negatively predicted CC patients’ resilience and QoL, and resilience positively predicted patients’ QoL. Patients’ family function was associated with their QoL directly and indirectly through the mediation of FoP and resilience, and the model explained 7% of the variation in FoP, 24% of the variation in resilience, and 42% of the variation in QoL. Conclusions. Chinese CC patients expressed poor QoL. FoP and resilience could mediate the association between patients’ family function and QoL. Healthcare professionals could improve QoL of patients with cervical cancer through reducing FoP and enhancing resilience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌患者对病情恶化的恐惧和复原力是家庭功能与生活质量之间关系的调解因素
目的探讨家庭功能对宫颈癌(CC)患者生活质量(QoL)的影响,并研究从家庭功能到 QoL 的路径中,对病情恶化的恐惧(FoP)和复原力的中介作用。研究方法于2021年12月至2022年12月期间进行了一项方便抽样的多中心横断面调查。从中国江苏省的五家三级甲等医院共招募了252名宫颈癌患者。患者填写了5个项目的自编家庭适应、伙伴关系、成长、亲情、决心(APGAR)量表、恐惧进展问卷简表、14个项目的复原力量表和12个项目的短式健康调查表。研究人员进行了结构方程建模(SEM),以探讨FoP和复原力在CC患者家庭功能和QoL之间的中介效应。采用 Bootstrapping 程序来验证中介变量间接效应的显著性。结果显示家庭功能的平均得分为 7.97 ± 2.41(量表范围:0-10),FoP 为 29.58 ± 10.14(量表范围:12-60),复原力为 69.37 ± 14.36(量表范围:14-98)。身体部分摘要(PCS)的平均得分为(41.87 ± 10.00)(量表范围:0-100),精神部分摘要(MCS)的平均得分为(46.68 ± 11.78)(量表范围:0-100)。家庭功能对患者的复原力有正向预测作用,对其FoP有负向预测作用,而FoP对CC患者的复原力和QoL有负向预测作用,复原力对患者的QoL有正向预测作用。患者的家庭功能与他们的 QoL 直接相关,并通过 FoP 和复原力的中介作用间接相关,该模型解释了 7% 的 FoP 变异、24% 的复原力变异和 42% 的 QoL 变异。结论中国CC患者的QoL较差。FoP和抗逆力可以调节患者家庭功能与QoL之间的关系。医护人员可通过降低FoP和提高抗逆力来改善宫颈癌患者的QoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
期刊最新文献
‘Death Doulas’ are not yet an Issue in German Palliative Care—A National Survey of Palliative Care Providers What is “Coaching” in Interventions for Patients in Cancer Care Research? A Systematic Scoping Review Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism After Radical Hysterectomy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Variation in the Diagnostic and Treatment Pathway in Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Mixed-Methods Study in the United Kingdom Navigating What Is Not Known—Patients’ Experience of the Life Threat Connected to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1