Credence and Belief: Distance- and Utility-based Approaches

IF 1.4 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1017/psa.2024.9
Minkyung Wang, Chisu Kim
{"title":"Credence and Belief: Distance- and Utility-based Approaches","authors":"Minkyung Wang, Chisu Kim","doi":"10.1017/psa.2024.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates the question of how subjective probability should relate to binary belief.We propose new distance minimization methods, and develop epistemic decision theoretic accounts. Both approaches can be shown to get “close” to the truth: the first one by getting “close” to a given probability, and the second one by getting expectedly “close” to the truth.More specifically, we study distance minimization with a refined notion of Bregman divergence and expected utility maximization with strict proper scores. Our main results reveal that the two ways to get “close” to the truth can coincide.","PeriodicalId":54620,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the question of how subjective probability should relate to binary belief.We propose new distance minimization methods, and develop epistemic decision theoretic accounts. Both approaches can be shown to get “close” to the truth: the first one by getting “close” to a given probability, and the second one by getting expectedly “close” to the truth.More specifically, we study distance minimization with a refined notion of Bregman divergence and expected utility maximization with strict proper scores. Our main results reveal that the two ways to get “close” to the truth can coincide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可信度与信念:基于距离和效用的方法
本文探讨了主观概率应如何与二元信念相关联的问题。我们提出了新的距离最小化方法,并发展了认识论决策理论的解释。这两种方法都能证明 "接近 "真相:第一种方法是 "接近 "给定概率,第二种方法是预期 "接近 "真相。更具体地说,我们研究了使用布雷格曼发散精炼概念的距离最小化和使用严格适当分数的预期效用最大化。我们的主要结果表明,这两种 "接近 "真相的方法是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1934, Philosophy of Science, along with its sponsoring society, the Philosophy of Science Association, has been dedicated to the furthering of studies and free discussion from diverse standpoints in the philosophy of science. The journal contains essays, discussion articles, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Concerns about Contextual Values in Science and the Legitimate/Illegitimate Distinction Bamboozled by Bonferroni Paleoclimate Proxies and the Benefits of Disunity Developmental Channeling and Evolutionary Dappling Individuating Cognitive Characters: Lessons from Praying Mantises and Plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1