Justice in fishing territories: Human rights violations in artisanal fisheries analyzed by the Colombian Constitutional Court

IF 2 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Political Ecology Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.2458/jpe.6026
Isabela Figueroa, Lina M Saavedra-Díaz, Paula Satizábal, Gina Noriega-Narváez, Yulibeth Velásquez-Mendoza
{"title":"Justice in fishing territories: Human rights violations in artisanal fisheries analyzed by the Colombian Constitutional Court","authors":"Isabela Figueroa, Lina M Saavedra-Díaz, Paula Satizábal, Gina Noriega-Narváez, Yulibeth Velásquez-Mendoza","doi":"10.2458/jpe.6026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seas and inland waters have historically been spaces where social struggles have been overlooked and made invisible. This article offers an interdisciplinary analysis of the Colombian Constitutional Court decisions related to human rights violations in artisanal fishing territories. We used a human rights-based approach to study 79 Constitutional Injunctions (Acciones de Tutela) and built a digital database 'Justice in Fishing Territories' (Justicia en Territorios Pesqueros). We identify and discuss the most frequently claimed and protected rights. Most Court proceedings are centered on participatory processes, indicating that actors within the artisanal fisheries sector are excluded from the discussion and approval of development projects. We conclude that the Colombian State has historically privileged the interests of industrial economic sectors to the detriment of the ways of living, territories, and rights of artisanal fishing populations.","PeriodicalId":46814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.6026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seas and inland waters have historically been spaces where social struggles have been overlooked and made invisible. This article offers an interdisciplinary analysis of the Colombian Constitutional Court decisions related to human rights violations in artisanal fishing territories. We used a human rights-based approach to study 79 Constitutional Injunctions (Acciones de Tutela) and built a digital database 'Justice in Fishing Territories' (Justicia en Territorios Pesqueros). We identify and discuss the most frequently claimed and protected rights. Most Court proceedings are centered on participatory processes, indicating that actors within the artisanal fisheries sector are excluded from the discussion and approval of development projects. We conclude that the Colombian State has historically privileged the interests of industrial economic sectors to the detriment of the ways of living, territories, and rights of artisanal fishing populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捕鱼区的正义:哥伦比亚宪法法院对个体渔业中侵犯人权行为的分析
历史上,海洋和内陆水域一直是社会斗争被忽视和看不见的地方。本文对哥伦比亚宪法法院有关手工捕鱼区侵犯人权行为的判决进行了跨学科分析。我们采用基于人权的方法研究了 79 项宪法禁令(Acciones de Tutela),并建立了数字数据库 "渔业领地的正义"(Justicia en Territorios Pesqueros)。我们确定并讨论了最常主张和保护的权利。大多数法院诉讼都以参与性程序为中心,这表明个体渔业部门的参与者被排除在开发项目的讨论和审批之外。我们的结论是,哥伦比亚国家在历史上一直将工业经济部门的利益置于优先地位,损害了个体渔业人口的生活方式、领土和权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Ecology
Journal of Political Ecology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
17.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Political Ecology is a peer reviewed journal (ISSN: 1073-0451), one of the longest standing, Gold Open Access journals in the social sciences. It began in 1994 and welcomes submissions in English, French and Spanish. We encourage research into the linkages between political economy and human environmental impacts across different locations and academic disciplines. The approach used in the journal is political ecology, not other fields, and authors should state clearly how their work contributes to, or extends, this approach. See, for example, the POLLEN network, or the ENTITLE blog.
期刊最新文献
The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction  Indigenous onto-epistemology and the Niyamgiri Movement in India Justice in fishing territories: Human rights violations in artisanal fisheries analyzed by the Colombian Constitutional Court Hydropolitical potentialities in a post-'Day Zero' Cape Town: "Sensemaking" and the Cape Flats Aquifer Review of Benally, Klee. 2023. No spiritual surrender: Indigenous anarchy in defense of the sacred
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1