The impact of uro-oncology multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) on clinical decision-making and adherence to MDTM recommendation: experience from a tertiary referral centre in Malaysia

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY African Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1186/s12301-024-00415-4
Norshuhada Amat, Lim Jeffery, Chai C. Ann, Yeoh W. Sien, Ahmad N. Fadzli, Shanggar Kuppusamy, Marniza Saad, Ong T. Aik
{"title":"The impact of uro-oncology multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) on clinical decision-making and adherence to MDTM recommendation: experience from a tertiary referral centre in Malaysia","authors":"Norshuhada Amat, Lim Jeffery, Chai C. Ann, Yeoh W. Sien, Ahmad N. Fadzli, Shanggar Kuppusamy, Marniza Saad, Ong T. Aik","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00415-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) has become an increasingly important part of disease management model, particularly in cancer care. MDTM consists of a group of doctors to provide independent opinions on diagnostic and treatment decisions, as well as personalized therapeutic plan for patients. By selecting the most suitable treatment for patients from multiple perspectives, management by multidisciplinary team (MDT) have been shown to have advantages over traditional treatment models. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of MDTM on the management of uro-oncological cases and adherence to MDTM plans. We retrospectively collected patients’ clinical information discussed in MDTM from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022 at our institution. The pre-MDTM treatment plan by the clinicians and the MDTM consensus plans were compared to assess the overall MDTM impact on patient management. Adherence to MDTM recommendations was also analyzed. Data on 432 patients discussed in MDTM from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022 were collected and analyzed. Prostate cancer was the most common type of cancer discussed (n = 212, 48.8%). MDTM had a significant impact on decision-making in 276 (63.6%) cases, with changes to patient management being observed in more than half of all cases. Adherence to MDTM outcomes was high with 383 (90.5%) of patients eventually had treatment according to the MDTM recommendation. The study highlights the importance of MDTM in the management of genitourinary malignancies, particularly in cases where no original plan exists. Patient’s compliance and adherence to the MDTM consensus plan are also very encouraging.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00415-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) has become an increasingly important part of disease management model, particularly in cancer care. MDTM consists of a group of doctors to provide independent opinions on diagnostic and treatment decisions, as well as personalized therapeutic plan for patients. By selecting the most suitable treatment for patients from multiple perspectives, management by multidisciplinary team (MDT) have been shown to have advantages over traditional treatment models. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of MDTM on the management of uro-oncological cases and adherence to MDTM plans. We retrospectively collected patients’ clinical information discussed in MDTM from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022 at our institution. The pre-MDTM treatment plan by the clinicians and the MDTM consensus plans were compared to assess the overall MDTM impact on patient management. Adherence to MDTM recommendations was also analyzed. Data on 432 patients discussed in MDTM from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022 were collected and analyzed. Prostate cancer was the most common type of cancer discussed (n = 212, 48.8%). MDTM had a significant impact on decision-making in 276 (63.6%) cases, with changes to patient management being observed in more than half of all cases. Adherence to MDTM outcomes was high with 383 (90.5%) of patients eventually had treatment according to the MDTM recommendation. The study highlights the importance of MDTM in the management of genitourinary malignancies, particularly in cases where no original plan exists. Patient’s compliance and adherence to the MDTM consensus plan are also very encouraging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泌尿肿瘤多学科小组会议(MDTM)对临床决策和遵守MDTM建议的影响:马来西亚一家三级转诊中心的经验
多学科团队会议(MDTM)已成为疾病管理模式中日益重要的一部分,尤其是在癌症护理方面。多学科团队会议由一组医生组成,就诊断和治疗决策提供独立意见,并为患者制定个性化治疗方案。与传统治疗模式相比,多学科团队(MDT)通过从多角度为患者选择最合适的治疗方法,已被证明具有优势。本研究旨在确定多学科团队管理对泌尿肿瘤病例管理的影响以及多学科团队管理计划的依从性。我们回顾性地收集了本院 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间在 MDTM 中讨论的患者临床信息。我们比较了临床医生在MDTM前的治疗计划和MDTM共识计划,以评估MDTM对患者管理的整体影响。此外,还分析了对 MDTM 建议的遵守情况。收集并分析了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间在 MDTM 中讨论的 432 名患者的数据。前列腺癌是最常讨论的癌症类型(n = 212,48.8%)。在 276 例(63.6%)病例中,MDTM 对决策产生了重大影响,超过半数的病例观察到患者管理发生了变化。对 MDTM 结果的坚持率很高,383 例(90.5%)患者最终根据 MDTM 建议进行了治疗。这项研究强调了 MDTM 在泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤治疗中的重要性,尤其是在没有原始计划的情况下。患者对MDTM共识计划的依从性和坚持性也非常令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digital rectal exam in prostate cancer screening: a critical review of the ERSPC Rotterdam study Outcome of perioperative immune enhancing nutrition in patients undergoing radical cystectomy A prospective study of the association between varicoceles and semen quality in men with infertility Comparison of combination therapy with tamsulosin and dutasteride or finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial Can the parameters of penile duplex assessment predict the success of urethroplasty?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1