Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis.

Q2 Medicine Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-12-31 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.51329/mehdiophthal1477
Taher Alshammari, Alaa Tarazi, Tasneem Aloqaili, Mohammed Aloqaily, Saif Aldeen AlRyalat
{"title":"Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis.","authors":"Taher Alshammari, Alaa Tarazi, Tasneem Aloqaili, Mohammed Aloqaily, Saif Aldeen AlRyalat","doi":"10.51329/mehdiophthal1477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most accurate method of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery has not been determined, and further studies are needed to reach a consensus. The aim of this study was to assess publications related to IOL power calculation formulas, mapping their yearly trends, most productive authors, top publishing countries and institutions, and areas of specialization for IOL power formulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive analysis of research articles published on the topic of IOL power calculation formulas. Using PubMed, we employed appropriate search terms and filtered the results for the period of January 1, 1946, to June 28, 2023. Data were analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Microsoft Excel programs. The visual representations of the collected data through the use of figures was provided to demonstrate the aspects of IOL power calculation research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 5475 documents in the initial search. Analysis of these documents revealed an increase in the number of publications, from one publication in 1946 to 201 publications in 2023. The top three countries contributing to these publications were the United States, China, and Japan, collectively accounting for over 27% of the total articles. However, the two institutions with the highest contributions were located in the United Kingdom and Hungary, neither of which was among the top 10 countries in overall contributions. Overall 15 326 authors contributed to publications pertaining to IOL power calculation formulas. Among these authors, the most prolific contributors included Achim Langenbucher from Saarland University (Germany), Giacomo Savini from G.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S. (Italy), and Kenneth J Hoffer from the University of California (United States). Saarland University emerged as the most productive institution, contributing equally to two distinct departments: the Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell Research and Congenital Aniridia, as well as the Department of Experimental Ophthalmology. The School of Physical Science at the Open University in the United Kingdom engaged in partnership with various institutions including Eye & Laser Clinic Castrop Rauxel in Germany and Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria. Among the top 10 keywords found in the publications were \"cataract\", \"cataract surgery\", and \"intraocular lens\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents the first scientometric analysis of publications related to IOL power calculation formulas. The study offers valuable insights into the geographic distribution, contributing authors, and emphasis of research on the IOL power calculation formulas. Further cooperation is essential to pinpoint the most suitable formula and to address gaps in our current understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":36524,"journal":{"name":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","volume":"12 3","pages":"115-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The most accurate method of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery has not been determined, and further studies are needed to reach a consensus. The aim of this study was to assess publications related to IOL power calculation formulas, mapping their yearly trends, most productive authors, top publishing countries and institutions, and areas of specialization for IOL power formulas.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of research articles published on the topic of IOL power calculation formulas. Using PubMed, we employed appropriate search terms and filtered the results for the period of January 1, 1946, to June 28, 2023. Data were analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Microsoft Excel programs. The visual representations of the collected data through the use of figures was provided to demonstrate the aspects of IOL power calculation research.

Results: We retrieved 5475 documents in the initial search. Analysis of these documents revealed an increase in the number of publications, from one publication in 1946 to 201 publications in 2023. The top three countries contributing to these publications were the United States, China, and Japan, collectively accounting for over 27% of the total articles. However, the two institutions with the highest contributions were located in the United Kingdom and Hungary, neither of which was among the top 10 countries in overall contributions. Overall 15 326 authors contributed to publications pertaining to IOL power calculation formulas. Among these authors, the most prolific contributors included Achim Langenbucher from Saarland University (Germany), Giacomo Savini from G.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S. (Italy), and Kenneth J Hoffer from the University of California (United States). Saarland University emerged as the most productive institution, contributing equally to two distinct departments: the Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell Research and Congenital Aniridia, as well as the Department of Experimental Ophthalmology. The School of Physical Science at the Open University in the United Kingdom engaged in partnership with various institutions including Eye & Laser Clinic Castrop Rauxel in Germany and Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria. Among the top 10 keywords found in the publications were "cataract", "cataract surgery", and "intraocular lens".

Conclusions: This study represents the first scientometric analysis of publications related to IOL power calculation formulas. The study offers valuable insights into the geographic distribution, contributing authors, and emphasis of research on the IOL power calculation formulas. Further cooperation is essential to pinpoint the most suitable formula and to address gaps in our current understanding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内透镜功率计算公式:科学计量学分析。
背景:白内障手术中最准确的人工晶体(IOL)功率计算方法尚未确定,需要进一步研究才能达成共识。本研究的目的是评估与人工晶体功率计算公式相关的出版物,绘制其年度趋势图、最有成果的作者、出版量最大的国家和机构以及人工晶体功率计算公式的专业领域:我们对以人工晶体植入术功率计算公式为主题发表的研究文章进行了全面分析。通过使用 PubMed,我们使用了适当的搜索条件,并对 1946 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 28 日期间的结果进行了筛选。我们使用 CiteSpace、VOSviewer 和 Microsoft Excel 程序对数据进行了分析。通过使用图表对收集到的数据进行了直观表示,以展示人工晶体功率计算研究的各个方面:在最初的搜索中,我们检索到了 5475 篇文献。对这些文件的分析表明,发表的论文数量从 1946 年的 1 篇增加到 2023 年的 201 篇。发表这些论文最多的三个国家分别是美国、中国和日本,合计占论文总数的 27% 以上。然而,投稿最多的两个机构分别位于英国和匈牙利,这两个国家均未跻身总投稿量排名前十的国家行列。共有 15 326 位作者发表了与人工晶体功率计算公式有关的文章。在这些作者中,贡献最多的包括萨尔州大学(德国)的 Achim Langenbucher、G.B. Bietti 基金会 I.R.C.C.S.(意大利)的 Giacomo Savini 和加利福尼亚大学(美国)的 Kenneth J Hoffer。萨尔州大学是成果最丰硕的机构,为两个不同的系做出了同样的贡献:罗尔夫-M-施维特博士肢端干细胞研究和先天性无眼病中心以及实验眼科系。英国开放大学物理科学学院与多家机构建立了合作伙伴关系,其中包括德国卡斯特罗普-劳塞尔眼科与激光诊所和奥地利林茨约翰内斯-开普勒大学。在出版物中发现的前 10 个关键词包括 "白内障"、"白内障手术 "和 "眼内晶状体":本研究首次对有关人工晶体功率计算公式的出版物进行了科学计量分析。该研究为了解有关人工晶体视力计算公式的地理分布、撰稿人和研究重点提供了宝贵的见解。为了找出最合适的计算公式并弥补我们目前认识上的不足,进一步的合作是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Crocus sativus (saffron) and age-related macular degeneration. Application and interpretation of linear-regression analysis. Intraretinal hyperreflective line: potential biomarker in various retinal disorders. Multifocal electroretinogram changes after panretinal photocoagulation in early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. One-year outcomes after intraocular collamer lens implantation in hyperopic astigmatism: a retrospective single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1