Psychometric properties of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire-short form among law enforcement officers

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Aggressive Behavior Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1002/ab.22145
Michael Christopher, Marissa Ferry, Akeesha Simmons, Alicia Vasquez, Brooke Reynolds, Daniel Grupe
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire-short form among law enforcement officers","authors":"Michael Christopher,&nbsp;Marissa Ferry,&nbsp;Akeesha Simmons,&nbsp;Alicia Vasquez,&nbsp;Brooke Reynolds,&nbsp;Daniel Grupe","doi":"10.1002/ab.22145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Repeatedly capturing national headlines, excessive law enforcement officer (LEO) use of force in critical incident encounters is one of the most divisive human rights issues in the United States. Valid and reliable measures of potential precursors to LEO excessive use of force, such as aggression, are needed. The Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire-short form (BPAQ-SF) is a validated measure of aggression across various populations; however, evaluation of this easily administered measure in high-stress, frontline populations such as LEOs is limited. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change the BPAQ-SF in a sample of LEOs. A confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the hierarchical solution provides a mixed fit to the data: SBχ²<sub>(25.84)</sub> = 62.50, <i>p</i> = .0001; comparative fit index = .94, non-normed fit index = .92, root mean square error of approximation = .19 (90% confidence interval = .17–.21), standardized root mean squared residual = .08. The BPAQ-SF demonstrated good internal consistency (<i>α</i> = .84) and test–retest reliability (<i>r</i> = .86), correlations in the expected direction with predictors of and buffers against aggression, and sensitivity to change among LEOs who participated in an intervention targeting aggression. Results support and extend previous findings suggesting that the BPAQ-SF is a valid and reliable measure of aggression among LEOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50842,"journal":{"name":"Aggressive Behavior","volume":"50 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggressive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.22145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repeatedly capturing national headlines, excessive law enforcement officer (LEO) use of force in critical incident encounters is one of the most divisive human rights issues in the United States. Valid and reliable measures of potential precursors to LEO excessive use of force, such as aggression, are needed. The Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire-short form (BPAQ-SF) is a validated measure of aggression across various populations; however, evaluation of this easily administered measure in high-stress, frontline populations such as LEOs is limited. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change the BPAQ-SF in a sample of LEOs. A confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the hierarchical solution provides a mixed fit to the data: SBχ²(25.84) = 62.50, p = .0001; comparative fit index = .94, non-normed fit index = .92, root mean square error of approximation = .19 (90% confidence interval = .17–.21), standardized root mean squared residual = .08. The BPAQ-SF demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .84) and test–retest reliability (r = .86), correlations in the expected direction with predictors of and buffers against aggression, and sensitivity to change among LEOs who participated in an intervention targeting aggression. Results support and extend previous findings suggesting that the BPAQ-SF is a valid and reliable measure of aggression among LEOs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Buss-Perry 攻击行为问卷--简表在执法人员中的心理测量特性。
执法人员在突发事件中过度使用武力是美国最具争议的人权问题之一,屡次占据全国新闻头条。需要对执法人员过度使用武力的潜在前兆(如攻击行为)进行有效可靠的测量。布斯-佩里攻击性问卷简表(Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire-short form,BPAQ-SF)是一种经过验证的针对不同人群的攻击性测量方法;然而,对这种易于管理的测量方法在高压力、一线人群(如执法人员)中的评估却很有限。本研究的主要目的是评估 BPAQ-SF 在地方执法人员样本中的有效性、可靠性和对变化的敏感性。一项确认性因素分析表明,分层方案与数据具有混合拟合性:SBχ²(25.84)= 62.50,p = .0001;比较拟合指数 = .94,非标准化拟合指数 = .92,均方根近似误差 = .19(90% 置信区间 = .17-.21),标准化均方根残差 = .08。BPAQ-SF显示出良好的内部一致性(α = .84)和测试-再测可靠性(r = .86),与攻击行为的预测因素和缓冲因素之间存在预期方向的相关性,以及对参与针对攻击行为干预的低等执法人员的变化的敏感性。研究结果支持并扩展了之前的研究结果,表明BPAQ-SF是一种有效、可靠的测量低等执法人员攻击行为的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aggressive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aggressive Behavior will consider manuscripts in the English language concerning the fields of Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Ethology, Psychiatry, Psychobiology, Psychology, and Sociology which relate to either overt or implied conflict behaviors. Papers concerning mechanisms underlying or influencing behaviors generally regarded as aggressive and the physiological and/or behavioral consequences of being subject to such behaviors will fall within the scope of the journal. Review articles will be considered as well as empirical and theoretical articles. Aggressive Behavior is the official journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression.
期刊最新文献
Cyber Aggression and Suicidal Ideation in Emerging Adults: Examining the Potential Roles of Depressive Symptoms and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury A Diathesis-Stress Approach to Understanding Partner Maltreatment Perpetration: A Longitudinal Study How Spiteful Are We? Validation of the Spitefulness Scale in Spaniards Online Violence in Adolescent and Young Adult Couples: The Role of Anxious Attachment and Hostile Sexism in a Dyadic Analysis The Pleasure of Revenge Predicts Both Vengeful and Benevolent Motivations Toward the Provocateur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1