Principles over Process: Fifty Years a Cognitive Therapist

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s10879-024-09619-9
Steven D. Hollon
{"title":"Principles over Process: Fifty Years a Cognitive Therapist","authors":"Steven D. Hollon","doi":"10.1007/s10879-024-09619-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The most important lesson that I have learned in my half century as a therapist (and therapy researcher) is that principles matter more than processes. I had the great good fortune to arrive in Philadelphia at a time when Beck and colleagues were just beginning to test the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression and what I learned was that helping clients (and myself) get the better of depression involved two main principles: (1) when in doubt do whatever you would have done if you were not depressed (behavioral); and (2) do not believe everything you think - check it out (cognitive). A third major principle is that the most powerful way to test an existing belief is to use one’s own behaviors to test its accuracy, which usually means doing whatever you least want to do in that situation (opposite action). I find that focusing on these principles is wholly liberating in the therapy process; I am free to be myself, to follow any line of inquiry, to respond to any request and to comport myself much as I would with any friend outside of therapy. This focus on principles has been good for my clients and even better for me.</p>","PeriodicalId":46994,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-024-09619-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most important lesson that I have learned in my half century as a therapist (and therapy researcher) is that principles matter more than processes. I had the great good fortune to arrive in Philadelphia at a time when Beck and colleagues were just beginning to test the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression and what I learned was that helping clients (and myself) get the better of depression involved two main principles: (1) when in doubt do whatever you would have done if you were not depressed (behavioral); and (2) do not believe everything you think - check it out (cognitive). A third major principle is that the most powerful way to test an existing belief is to use one’s own behaviors to test its accuracy, which usually means doing whatever you least want to do in that situation (opposite action). I find that focusing on these principles is wholly liberating in the therapy process; I am free to be myself, to follow any line of inquiry, to respond to any request and to comport myself much as I would with any friend outside of therapy. This focus on principles has been good for my clients and even better for me.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原则重于过程:认知治疗师五十年
在我半个世纪的治疗师(和治疗研究者)生涯中学到的最重要的一课就是,原则比过程更重要。我有幸来到费城时,贝克和同事们刚刚开始测试认知疗法对抑郁症的疗效,我学到的是,帮助客户(和我自己)摆脱抑郁涉及两个主要原则:(我学到的是,帮助客户(和我自己)摆脱抑郁涉及两个主要原则:(1)当有疑问时,做如果你没有抑郁时你会做的事情(行为原则);(2)不要相信你所想的一切--检查一下(认知原则)。第三个主要原则是,检验现有信念的最有效方法是用自己的行为来检验其准确性,这通常意味着在这种情况下做你最不想做的事情(相反行动)。我发现,在治疗过程中,关注这些原则完全是一种解放;我可以自由地做我自己,遵循任何调查思路,对任何请求做出回应,就像对待治疗之外的任何朋友一样。这种对原则的关注对我的客户有好处,对我自己更是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy provides an international forum to critique the complexities and controversies facing psychotherapists. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed articles that critically analyze theory, research, or clinical practice. Empirical studies, panel discussions, essays, case studies, brief reports, and theoretical articles are published. Psychotherapists and clinical researchers will find this journal an important vehicle to review the problems of treating a variety of patients.
期刊最新文献
Transdiagnostic Emotion-Focused Therapy for Couples with Co-Morbid Relational and Mood, Anxiety and Related Difficulties An Integrative Model to Increase Client Motivation During the Psychotherapy Process Are Therapist Effects More Crucial than We Thought? The Timelessness of the Scar in the Borderline Personality Disorder BPD: A Systemic Intervention in a Case of Child Sexual Abuse The 7th Annual Psyche Awards: Honoring the Most Valuable Papers in Mental Health Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1