The politics of military deployments: contestation of foreign and security policy in the Netherlands

IF 1.4 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Politics Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1057/s41311-024-00556-x
Richard Sonneveld
{"title":"The politics of military deployments: contestation of foreign and security policy in the Netherlands","authors":"Richard Sonneveld","doi":"10.1057/s41311-024-00556-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In many liberal democracies today, foreign policy is the subject of increasing political contestation. Recent studies have demonstrated that political parties cluster predictably when voting on military deployments. In the economic left/right dimension, support for military deployments is highest for centrist and centre-right parties, and decreases towards the (far) left and (far) right. This pattern is not as robust in the non-economic GAL/TAN dimension, which pits parties with green, alternative and libertarian (GAL) values against those with traditional, authoritarian and nationalist ones (TAN). This article addresses the dimensionality of foreign and security policy by analysing 57 votes on military deployments in the Dutch parliament between 1998 and 2019. The results show that even in the Netherlands, where the GAL/TAN dimension is most likely to explain party–political contestation, foreign and security policy remains more attuned to the left/right cleavage. These findings contribute to analyses of party–political contestation in other Western European democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46593,"journal":{"name":"International Politics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00556-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many liberal democracies today, foreign policy is the subject of increasing political contestation. Recent studies have demonstrated that political parties cluster predictably when voting on military deployments. In the economic left/right dimension, support for military deployments is highest for centrist and centre-right parties, and decreases towards the (far) left and (far) right. This pattern is not as robust in the non-economic GAL/TAN dimension, which pits parties with green, alternative and libertarian (GAL) values against those with traditional, authoritarian and nationalist ones (TAN). This article addresses the dimensionality of foreign and security policy by analysing 57 votes on military deployments in the Dutch parliament between 1998 and 2019. The results show that even in the Netherlands, where the GAL/TAN dimension is most likely to explain party–political contestation, foreign and security policy remains more attuned to the left/right cleavage. These findings contribute to analyses of party–political contestation in other Western European democracies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事部署的政治:荷兰外交和安全政策的争议
在当今许多自由民主国家中,外交政策成为越来越多政治争论的主题。最近的研究表明,在对军事部署进行投票时,各政党的聚类是可以预测的。在经济左/右维度上,中间派和中右派政党对军事部署的支持率最高,向(极)左派和(极)右派递减。这种模式在非经济的 GAL/TAN 维度中并不明显,该维度将具有绿色、另类和自由主义(GAL)价值观的政党与具有传统、独裁和民族主义(TAN)价值观的政党对立起来。本文通过分析 1998 年至 2019 年间荷兰议会关于军事部署的 57 次投票,探讨了外交和安全政策的维度。结果表明,即使在 GAL/TAN 维度最有可能解释政党政治竞争的荷兰,外交和安全政策仍然更贴近左/右分裂。这些发现有助于分析其他西欧民主国家的政党政治竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: International Politics?is a leading peer reviewed journal dedicated to transnational issues and global problems. It subscribes to no political or methodological identity and welcomes any appropriate contributions designed to communicate findings and enhance dialogue.International Politics?defines itself as critical in character truly international in scope and totally engaged with the central issues facing the world today. Taking as its point of departure the simple but essential notion that no one approach has all the answers it aims to provide a global forum for a rapidly expanding community of scholars from across the range of academic disciplines.International Politics?aims to encourage debate controversy and reflection. Topics addressed within the journal include:Rethinking the Clash of CivilizationsMyths of WestphaliaHolocaust and ChinaLeo Strauss and the Cold WarJustin Rosenberg and Globalisation TheoryPutin and the WestThe USA Post-BushCan China Rise Peacefully Just WarsCuba Castro and AfterGramsci and IRIs America in Decline。
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing religion and religious ideology in political science research: what is in a name and what description can do Adam Watson and international relations: a contemporary reassessment—introduction Conspiratorial imaginaries of the right: a commentary on capital, race and space by Richard Saull From mandate to actor: the case of the International Law Commission EU–Russia energy cooperation: implications for Lithuania’s energy security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1