Towards circular economy indicators: Evidence from the European Union.

IF 3.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Waste Management & Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1177/0734242X241237171
Idiano D'Adamo, Daniele Favari, Massimo Gastaldi, Julian Kirchherr
{"title":"Towards circular economy indicators: Evidence from the European Union.","authors":"Idiano D'Adamo, Daniele Favari, Massimo Gastaldi, Julian Kirchherr","doi":"10.1177/0734242X241237171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Union (EU) is moving towards sustainable development, and a key role is played by circular economy (CE) models geared towards reducing pressure on natural resources, generating jobs and fostering economic opportunities. Indicators are able to aggregate a variety of information and their use, through the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), allows the performance of alternatives to be monitored. This work aims to calculate the performance of the EU27 in the years 2019 and 2020 according to 15 CE indicators available on Eurostat. The results of the Analytic Hierarchy process show that the greatest impact on circularity is determined by the category 'competitiveness and innovation', which together with the category 'global sustainability and resilience' accounts for two thirds of the overall weight. The MCDA results show that Belgium prevails in both the baseline and alternative scenarios, ahead of Italy and the Netherlands respectively. In general, circular policies see western European countries excel, while the performance of eastern European countries is weaker. The implications of this work highlight the three main barriers to the development of CE models: (i) illegal waste management; (ii) lack of knowledge and low level of investment in circular technologies and (iii) low distribution of value among stakeholders. In this way, resource management based on circularity will enable Europe to meet the challenges of sustainability with less dependence on imported raw materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23671,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management & Research","volume":" ","pages":"670-680"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management & Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241237171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union (EU) is moving towards sustainable development, and a key role is played by circular economy (CE) models geared towards reducing pressure on natural resources, generating jobs and fostering economic opportunities. Indicators are able to aggregate a variety of information and their use, through the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), allows the performance of alternatives to be monitored. This work aims to calculate the performance of the EU27 in the years 2019 and 2020 according to 15 CE indicators available on Eurostat. The results of the Analytic Hierarchy process show that the greatest impact on circularity is determined by the category 'competitiveness and innovation', which together with the category 'global sustainability and resilience' accounts for two thirds of the overall weight. The MCDA results show that Belgium prevails in both the baseline and alternative scenarios, ahead of Italy and the Netherlands respectively. In general, circular policies see western European countries excel, while the performance of eastern European countries is weaker. The implications of this work highlight the three main barriers to the development of CE models: (i) illegal waste management; (ii) lack of knowledge and low level of investment in circular technologies and (iii) low distribution of value among stakeholders. In this way, resource management based on circularity will enable Europe to meet the challenges of sustainability with less dependence on imported raw materials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现循环经济指标:来自欧盟的证据。
欧盟(EU)正朝着可持续发展的方向迈进,循环经济(CE)模式在其中发挥了关键作用,其目的是减少对自然资源的压力、创造就业机会和促进经济发展。指标能够汇总各种信息,通过使用多标准决策分析 (MCDA),指标的使用可以监测替代方案的绩效。这项工作旨在根据欧盟统计局提供的 15 个经济指标,计算欧盟 27 国在 2019 年和 2020 年的绩效。层次分析法的结果表明,对循环性影响最大的是 "竞争力和创新 "类别,它与 "全球可持续性和复原力 "类别一起占总权重的三分之二。MCDA结果表明,比利时在基准情景和备选情景中都占了上风,分别领先于意大利和荷兰。总体而言,西欧国家在循环政策方面表现突出,而东欧国家的表现较弱。这项工作的意义强调了发展循环经济模式的三大障碍:(i) 非法废物管理;(ii) 缺乏对循环技术的了解和投资水平低;(iii) 利益相关者之间的价值分配低。这样,基于循环性的资源管理将使欧洲能够在减少对进口原材料依赖的情况下应对可持续发展的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waste Management & Research
Waste Management & Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
232
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Waste Management & Research (WM&R) publishes peer-reviewed articles relating to both the theory and practice of waste management and research. Published on behalf of the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) topics include: wastes (focus on solids), processes and technologies, management systems and tools, and policy and regulatory frameworks, sustainable waste management designs, operations, policies or practices.
期刊最新文献
A review on European sustainable practices in end-of-life vehicles management. Shifting perceptions of informal operators in the service and value chains: A retrospective of 40 years of observation and advocacy for informal recyclers and waste service providers, through the eyes of five global participant-researchers. Sustainable waste management approach towards efficient resource utilization. Developing WasteSAM: A novel approach for accurate construction waste image segmentation to facilitate efficient recycling. Risk minimizing framework for solar photovoltaics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1