Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.

Polish journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2024.135474
Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin
{"title":"Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.","authors":"Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2024.135474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2024.135474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).

Material and methods: A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.

Results: The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (p < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.

Conclusions: Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简略乳腺 MRI 在诊断乳腺癌中的诊断有效性:使用 BI-RADS 与完整乳腺 MRI 方案的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定磁共振成像(MRI)乳腺简略方案(AP)在使用 BI-RADS 诊断乳腺恶性病变方面的诊断性能,并与完整诊断方案(FDP)的诊断准确性进行比较:进行了一项前瞻性单中心研究。共有 125 名患有可疑乳腺肿块的女性患者接受了 AP 和 FDP MRI 检查。AP和FDP图像由两名在乳腺成像领域有10年经验的放射科医生独立解读,如有分歧,则由第三名医生解决。以组织病理学检查为参考,计算了 FDP 和 AP 在乳腺癌筛查中的诊断效果。利用 ROC 曲线估算出预测恶性程度的最佳 BI-RADS 临界值。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验估计了两种方案在图像解读时间上的差异。此外,还使用 Cohen's κ 检验评估了两种方案之间的检验一致性:研究包括 83 个恶性病变和 42 个良性病变。AP的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为90.5%、96.4%和94.4%,而FDP的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为92.9%、100%和97.6%。BI-RADS 3 类是预测恶性肿瘤的最佳临界值。两种方案在判读时间上有明显差异(P < 0.001)。两种方案之间的一致性非常好,κ为0.915:乳腺磁共振成像 AP 可代替 FDP 来识别乳腺癌,诊断效果相似。此外,它还能减少判读时间和扫描成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing radiology education for medical students: leveraging digital tools and resources. Application of ultrasound-guided intranodal lymphangiography in the diagnosis and treatment of chylous ascites after abdominal surgery. Medication-induced changes on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. The peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: a review of the pretreatment approach. Comparative efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus B-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic abscesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1