Consensus-based ethical best practices for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography in the emergency department

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10963
Samantha K. Chao MD, Yiju T. Liu MD, Charles W. Kropf MD, Robert D. Huang MD, Nik Theyyunni MD, Lindsay A. Taylor MD, Janice I. Firn PhD, Ross Kessler MD, Daniel R. Micheller MD, Alethia J. Battles JD, Natalja P. Rosculet MD, Emily E. Ager MD, MPH, Alyssa A. Valentyne MD, Christine J. Schellack, John P. Hennessy MS, Cameron White, Ryan V. Tucker MD
{"title":"Consensus-based ethical best practices for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography in the emergency department","authors":"Samantha K. Chao MD,&nbsp;Yiju T. Liu MD,&nbsp;Charles W. Kropf MD,&nbsp;Robert D. Huang MD,&nbsp;Nik Theyyunni MD,&nbsp;Lindsay A. Taylor MD,&nbsp;Janice I. Firn PhD,&nbsp;Ross Kessler MD,&nbsp;Daniel R. Micheller MD,&nbsp;Alethia J. Battles JD,&nbsp;Natalja P. Rosculet MD,&nbsp;Emily E. Ager MD, MPH,&nbsp;Alyssa A. Valentyne MD,&nbsp;Christine J. Schellack,&nbsp;John P. Hennessy MS,&nbsp;Cameron White,&nbsp;Ryan V. Tucker MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient-centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus-based best practice guidance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10963","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient-centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus-based best practice guidance.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus.

Results

Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application.

Conclusions

Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在急诊科进行教育性护理点超声波检查的最佳伦理实践共识
目的 目前还没有针对以患者为中心的伦理问题(如获得知情同意)的护理点教育性超声波检查(POCUS)标准化协议。本研究旨在确定教育性 POCUS 的伦理应用原则,并制定基于共识的最佳实践指南。 方法 一位训练有素的伦理学家在医学图书馆员的帮助下查阅文献后编制了一份问卷。召集了一个包括医学教育、法律和生物伦理学专家、医学受训人员和无医学背景人员在内的多元化小组。小组成员通过三轮改良德尔菲程序,就他们对伦理原则的认同程度和行为的适当性进行投票。高度一致被定义为 80% 或以上的共识。 结果 小组成员共对 38 个项目进行了投票:其中 15 项与患者同意和选择过程有关,8 项与实施教育性 POCUS 时的做法有关,15 项涉及 POCUS 应用场景。13个与患者同意和选择相关的项目、8个与执行实践相关的项目以及10个涉及POCUS应用的场景均达成了高度一致。 结论 根据专家共识,最佳伦理实践包括:在实施教育性 POCUS 之前获得知情同意;允许患者拒绝接受教育性 POCUS;告知患者该检查并非其医疗评估的一部分且不收费;使用适当的铺巾技术;保持专业的环境;与护理患者的主要团队协调披露偶然发现。各医疗机构在培训医生、研究员、住院医师和医科学生时,可采用这些做法来鼓励合乎道德地使用教育性 POCUS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience. Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1