The Impact of Delivery Reform on Health Information Exchange with Behavioral Health Providers: Results from a National Representative Survey of Ambulatory Physicians

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s10488-024-01367-1
Elizabeth B. Matthews
{"title":"The Impact of Delivery Reform on Health Information Exchange with Behavioral Health Providers: Results from a National Representative Survey of Ambulatory Physicians","authors":"Elizabeth B. Matthews","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01367-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Health information exchange (HIE) is an effective way to coordinate care, but HIE between health and behavioral health providers is limited. Recent delivery reform models, including the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) and Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) prioritize interprofessional collaboration, but little is known about their impact on behavioral health HIE. This study explores whether delivery reform participation affects behavioral health HIE among ambulatory health providers using pooled 2015–2019 data from the National Electronic Health Record Survey, a nationally representative survey of ambulatory physicians’ technology use (<i>n</i> = 8,703). The independent variable in this analysis was provider participation in ACO, PCMH, Hybrid ACO-PCMH, or standard care. The dependent variable was HIE with behavioral health providers. Chi square analysis estimated unweighted rates of behavioral health HIE across reform models. Logistic regression estimated the impact of delivery reform participation on rates of behavioral health HIE. Unweighted estimates indicated that Hybrid ACO-PCMH providers had the highest rates of HIE (<i>n</i> = 330, 33%). In the fully adjust model, rates of HIE were higher among ACO (AOR = 2.66, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), PCMH (AOR = 4.73, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and Hybrid ACO-PCMH participants (AOR = 5.55, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) compared to standard care, but they did not significantly vary between delivery models. Physicians infrequently engage in HIE with behavioral health providers. Compared to standard care, higher rates of HIE were found across all models of delivery reform. More work is needed to identify common elements of delivery reform models that are most effective in supporting this behavior</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01367-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health information exchange (HIE) is an effective way to coordinate care, but HIE between health and behavioral health providers is limited. Recent delivery reform models, including the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) and Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) prioritize interprofessional collaboration, but little is known about their impact on behavioral health HIE. This study explores whether delivery reform participation affects behavioral health HIE among ambulatory health providers using pooled 2015–2019 data from the National Electronic Health Record Survey, a nationally representative survey of ambulatory physicians’ technology use (n = 8,703). The independent variable in this analysis was provider participation in ACO, PCMH, Hybrid ACO-PCMH, or standard care. The dependent variable was HIE with behavioral health providers. Chi square analysis estimated unweighted rates of behavioral health HIE across reform models. Logistic regression estimated the impact of delivery reform participation on rates of behavioral health HIE. Unweighted estimates indicated that Hybrid ACO-PCMH providers had the highest rates of HIE (n = 330, 33%). In the fully adjust model, rates of HIE were higher among ACO (AOR = 2.66, p < .01), PCMH (AOR = 4.73, p < .001) and Hybrid ACO-PCMH participants (AOR = 5.55, p < .001) compared to standard care, but they did not significantly vary between delivery models. Physicians infrequently engage in HIE with behavioral health providers. Compared to standard care, higher rates of HIE were found across all models of delivery reform. More work is needed to identify common elements of delivery reform models that are most effective in supporting this behavior

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗服务改革对与行为健康提供者进行健康信息交流的影响:流动医生全国代表性调查的结果。
健康信息交换(HIE)是协调医疗服务的一种有效方式,但医疗服务提供者与行为医疗服务提供者之间的 HIE 却很有限。最近的医疗服务改革模式,包括责任医疗组织(ACO)和以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH),都将跨专业合作列为优先事项,但人们对其对行为健康 HIE 的影响知之甚少。本研究利用 "全国电子病历调查"(National Electronic Health Record Survey,一项具有全国代表性的非住院医师技术使用情况调查,n = 8703)中的 2015-2019 年汇总数据,探讨了医疗服务改革的参与是否会影响非住院医疗服务提供者的行为健康 HIE。该分析的自变量是医疗服务提供者参与 ACO、PCMH、混合 ACO-PCMH 或标准医疗的情况。因变量是与行为健康医疗服务提供者的 HIE。卡方分析估计了不同改革模式下行为健康 HIE 的非加权率。逻辑回归估算了参与医疗服务改革对行为健康 HIE 率的影响。非加权估计结果表明,混合 ACO-PCMH 医疗服务提供者的 HIE 率最高(n = 330,33%)。在完全调整模型中,ACO 的 HIE 发生率更高(AOR = 2.66,p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1