Postendodontic Pain Using Single File System with Different Irrigation Protocols in Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Control Trial.

Q3 Dentistry Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3572

Nishtha V Kathiria, Kailash Attur, Kamal M Bagda, Karthik P Venkataraghavan, Kiran Patel, Mohammed B Mustafa, Shylaja K Attur

{"title":"Postendodontic Pain Using Single File System with Different Irrigation Protocols in Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Nishtha V Kathiria, Kailash Attur, Kamal M Bagda, Karthik P Venkataraghavan, Kiran Patel, Mohammed B Mustafa, Shylaja K Attur","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the intensity of postendodontic pain (PEP) using final irrigation with side-vented needle (SV), EndoActivator (EA), and Ultra X (UX) in single-visit endodontics (SVE) with F-One rotary files.Materials and methods: A total 150 patients indicated for endodontic treatment were selected. Single-visit endodontics treatment was performed under local anesthesia. For the final irrigation protocol, they were divided into three groups: group I (SV), group II (EA), and group III (UX). The severity of PEP was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) score after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Analgesics taken by patients, for pain, were also recorded. Finally, the data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05.Results: Postendodontic pain was less in group III (UX) and group II (EA) compared with group I (SV) at 6 and 12 hours, which is statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference found after 24 hours and 48 hours.Conclusion: The intensity of PEP was minimum in patients treated with EndoActivator and ultrasonic along with single rotary file systems. The incidence of analgesic intake was similar in all three groups. How to cite this article: Kathiria NV, Attur K, Bagda KM, et al. Postendodontic Pain Using Single File System with Different Irrigation Protocols in Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Control Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):180-185.","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 2","pages":"180-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the intensity of postendodontic pain (PEP) using final irrigation with side-vented needle (SV), EndoActivator (EA), and Ultra X (UX) in single-visit endodontics (SVE) with F-One rotary files.

Materials and methods: A total 150 patients indicated for endodontic treatment were selected. Single-visit endodontics treatment was performed under local anesthesia. For the final irrigation protocol, they were divided into three groups: group I (SV), group II (EA), and group III (UX). The severity of PEP was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) score after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Analgesics taken by patients, for pain, were also recorded. Finally, the data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05.

Results: Postendodontic pain was less in group III (UX) and group II (EA) compared with group I (SV) at 6 and 12 hours, which is statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference found after 24 hours and 48 hours.

Conclusion: The intensity of PEP was minimum in patients treated with EndoActivator and ultrasonic along with single rotary file systems. The incidence of analgesic intake was similar in all three groups. How to cite this article: Kathiria NV, Attur K, Bagda KM, et al. Postendodontic Pain Using Single File System with Different Irrigation Protocols in Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Control Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):180-185.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

在单次根管治疗中使用不同冲洗方案的单锉系统治疗根管治疗后疼痛：随机对照试验

目的：评估在使用F-One旋转锉的单次根管治疗（SVE）中，使用侧进针（SV）、EndoActivator（EA）和Ultra X（UX）进行终末冲洗时，牙髓治疗后疼痛（PEP）的强度：共选择了 150 名牙髓治疗患者。单次根管治疗在局部麻醉下进行。最终灌洗方案将患者分为三组：第一组（SV）、第二组（EA）和第三组（UX）。分别在 6、12、24 和 48 小时后使用视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评估 PEP 的严重程度。患者服用的止痛药也被记录在案。最后，使用 SPSS 20.0 软件对数据进行制表和统计分析，显著性水平为 0.05：与第一组（SV）相比，第三组（UX）和第二组（EA）在 6 小时和 12 小时内的根管治疗后疼痛较轻，差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。在 24 小时和 48 小时后，差异无统计学意义：结论：在使用 EndoActivator 和超声波以及单旋转锉系统治疗的患者中，PEP 的强度最小。三组患者的镇痛药摄入量相似。本文引用方式Kathiria NV, Attur K, Bagda KM, et al：随机对照试验》。J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):180-185.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

174

期刊介绍： The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.