Public Opinion, Rivalry, and the Democratic Peace: Experimental Evidence from South Korea

IF 2.4 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1093/isq/sqae027
Gidong Kim, Yu Bin Kim, Dongjin Kwak
{"title":"Public Opinion, Rivalry, and the Democratic Peace: Experimental Evidence from South Korea","authors":"Gidong Kim, Yu Bin Kim, Dongjin Kwak","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqae027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies on the public opinion mechanism of the democratic peace have demonstrated experimentally that democratic citizens are averse to attacking other democracies. The presence of rivalry, however, has long been recognized as one of the important factors contributing to either initiation or recurrence of international conflict. Despite such importance, our understanding remains limited as to how rivalry affects public opinion, particularly in the context of the democratic peace. In this article, we argue that democratic publics’ perception of rivalry weakens the effect of regime type. We expect democratic publics to be less reluctant in terms of fighting other rival democracies. Using an original survey experiment in South Korea, we demonstrate that the South Korean public, similar to those of western democracies, is reluctant to use force against nonrival democracies, but less so against rival democracies. Our findings suggest that the scope of the democratic peace should be qualified.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies on the public opinion mechanism of the democratic peace have demonstrated experimentally that democratic citizens are averse to attacking other democracies. The presence of rivalry, however, has long been recognized as one of the important factors contributing to either initiation or recurrence of international conflict. Despite such importance, our understanding remains limited as to how rivalry affects public opinion, particularly in the context of the democratic peace. In this article, we argue that democratic publics’ perception of rivalry weakens the effect of regime type. We expect democratic publics to be less reluctant in terms of fighting other rival democracies. Using an original survey experiment in South Korea, we demonstrate that the South Korean public, similar to those of western democracies, is reluctant to use force against nonrival democracies, but less so against rival democracies. Our findings suggest that the scope of the democratic peace should be qualified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舆论、竞争与民主和平:韩国的实验证据
最近关于民主和平的舆论机制的研究通过实验证明,民主公民不愿意攻击其他民主国家。然而,长期以来,竞争的存在一直被认为是导致国际冲突爆发或复发的重要因素之一。尽管如此重要,我们对竞争如何影响公众舆论的理解仍然有限,尤其是在民主和平的背景下。在本文中,我们认为民主公众对竞争的看法会削弱政权类型的影响。我们预计,民主公众不太愿意与其他敌对民主政体作战。通过在韩国进行的一项原创调查实验,我们证明韩国公众与西方民主国家的公众类似,不愿意对非敌对民主国家使用武力,但对敌对民主国家则不太愿意。我们的研究结果表明,民主和平的范围应该有所限定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: International Studies Quarterly, the official journal of the International Studies Association, seeks to acquaint a broad audience of readers with the best work being done in the variety of intellectual traditions included under the rubric of international studies. Therefore, the editors welcome all submissions addressing this community"s theoretical, empirical, and normative concerns. First preference will continue to be given to articles that address and contribute to important disciplinary and interdisciplinary questions and controversies.
期刊最新文献
Inference with Extremes: Accounting for Extreme Values in Count Regression Models Contesting the Securitization of Migration: NGOs, IGOs, and the Security Backlash Dealing with Clashes of International Law: A Microlevel Study of Climate and Trade Nationalism, Internationalism, and Interventionism: How Overseas Military Service Influences Foreign Policy Attitudes Preferential Trade Agreements and Leaders’ Business Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1