Information combination and transformation: a paradox and its resolution

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Accreditation and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1007/s00769-024-01578-x
Hening Huang
{"title":"Information combination and transformation: a paradox and its resolution","authors":"Hening Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01578-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In his recent paper (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100416), Willink showed two contradictory theoretical solutions to the problem of combining and transforming two sets of information about the same quantity. Each set of information is represented by a probability density function (PDF), and the transformation function is nonlinear. We refer to Willink’s contradictory result as “Willink paradox”. Two operations: (a) information combination and (b) information transformation are both mathematically valid according to probability theory. Therefore, the two contradictory solutions are both theoretically correct. In practice such as measurement uncertainty analysis, however, we cannot use both solutions; we must choose one or the other. We propose an entropy metric that can be used to provide a practical solution to the Willink paradox. Three examples are presented to illustrate the Willink paradox and the proposed entropy metric.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 3","pages":"183 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01578-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his recent paper (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100416), Willink showed two contradictory theoretical solutions to the problem of combining and transforming two sets of information about the same quantity. Each set of information is represented by a probability density function (PDF), and the transformation function is nonlinear. We refer to Willink’s contradictory result as “Willink paradox”. Two operations: (a) information combination and (b) information transformation are both mathematically valid according to probability theory. Therefore, the two contradictory solutions are both theoretically correct. In practice such as measurement uncertainty analysis, however, we cannot use both solutions; we must choose one or the other. We propose an entropy metric that can be used to provide a practical solution to the Willink paradox. Three examples are presented to illustrate the Willink paradox and the proposed entropy metric.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息组合与转换:一个悖论及其解决方案
威林克在他最近的论文(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100416)中,针对同一数量的两组信息的组合和变换问题,提出了两种相互矛盾的理论解决方案。每组信息都由一个概率密度函数 (PDF) 表示,而变换函数是非线性的。我们把 Willink 的矛盾结果称为 "Willink 悖论"。根据概率论,(a) 信息组合和 (b) 信息变换这两种操作在数学上都是有效的。因此,这两个相互矛盾的解决方案在理论上都是正确的。然而,在测量不确定性分析等实践中,我们无法同时使用这两种解决方案,必须二选一。我们提出了一种熵度量方法,可用于为 Willink 悖论提供实用的解决方案。我们将通过三个例子来说明 Willink 悖论和所提出的熵指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Certification of the total element mass fractions in UME EnvCRM 03 soil sample via a joint research project Association between blood lead levels and socio-demographic factors among outpatient children in Ningbo, China Proficiency tests for analysis of pesticide residues in kimchi cabbage and ginseng in South Korea from 2008 to 2020 Points to consider when establishing an equipment calibration programme in a conventional food microbiology laboratory for ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation purpose Approaches for the production of reference materials with qualitative properties—The new International Standard ISO 33406
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1