Just Police Violence: Liberal ideology and the critique of violence from Walter Benjamin to Black Lives Matter

Koshka Duff
{"title":"Just Police Violence: Liberal ideology and the critique of violence from Walter Benjamin to Black Lives Matter","authors":"Koshka Duff","doi":"10.1163/27727882-bja00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPolicing is broadly legitimate – even while imperfect and in need of reform. This axiom of liberal political theory and practice is shaken by movements like Black Lives Matter, which confront and expose carceral violence as the routine, deadly edge of racial capitalism. Thinking with abolitionist currents within these movements, this paper engages critical theory to unpick the ideological discourses that legitimise police violence in ‘real existing liberalism’. I argue that justifications of policing replicate the ‘analytic atomism’ and mythologisation of law that Neu’s Just Liberal Violence identifies in defences of sweatshops, torture, and war. I bring together Benjamin’s classic excavation of sovereign power in the policing function with the experiences of today’s policed subjects to reveal the limitations of liberal appeals to ‘the rule of law’. The standard figuration of oppressive violence as exceptional, deviant, and unlawful, I argue, serves to legitimise the institutions in and through which that violence is normalised.","PeriodicalId":326032,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence","volume":"609 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27727882-bja00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policing is broadly legitimate – even while imperfect and in need of reform. This axiom of liberal political theory and practice is shaken by movements like Black Lives Matter, which confront and expose carceral violence as the routine, deadly edge of racial capitalism. Thinking with abolitionist currents within these movements, this paper engages critical theory to unpick the ideological discourses that legitimise police violence in ‘real existing liberalism’. I argue that justifications of policing replicate the ‘analytic atomism’ and mythologisation of law that Neu’s Just Liberal Violence identifies in defences of sweatshops, torture, and war. I bring together Benjamin’s classic excavation of sovereign power in the policing function with the experiences of today’s policed subjects to reveal the limitations of liberal appeals to ‘the rule of law’. The standard figuration of oppressive violence as exceptional, deviant, and unlawful, I argue, serves to legitimise the institutions in and through which that violence is normalised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公正的警察暴力:从沃尔特-本雅明到 "黑人生命至上 "的自由意识形态与暴力批判
治安管理具有广泛的合法性--即使它并不完美,需要改革。自由主义政治理论与实践的这一公理被 "黑人生命至上 "等运动所动摇,这些运动对抗并揭露了作为种族资本主义常规、致命边缘的殡葬暴力。本文结合这些运动中的废奴主义思潮,运用批判理论来解读 "现实存在的自由主义 "中使警察暴力合法化的意识形态话语。我认为,维持治安的理由复制了纽的《公正的自由主义暴力》(Just Liberal Violence)一书中为血汗工厂、酷刑和战争辩护时所指出的 "分析原子论 "和法律神话化。我将本雅明对警务职能中主权权力的经典挖掘与当今警务主体的经历相结合,揭示了自由主义对 "法治 "的诉求的局限性。我认为,将压迫性暴力行为形象化为例外、离经叛道和非法的标准做法,有助于使暴力正常化的机构合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just Police Violence: Liberal ideology and the critique of violence from Walter Benjamin to Black Lives Matter Moral Excuse to the Pacifist’s Rescue1 Through a queer lens: Sybil Morrison and Myrtle Solomon, stalwarts of the British and international peace movement ¡Basta Ya! The Basque Civic Movement and Nonviolent Resistance to eta’s Terrorism Talking to Children About War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1