COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD

Diego Hernan Hidalgo, Roberto Alejandro Guevara, Marlon Hernan Navarro
{"title":"COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD","authors":"Diego Hernan Hidalgo, Roberto Alejandro Guevara, Marlon Hernan Navarro","doi":"10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).str-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this work is to compare the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system and the Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system using the AHP multi-criteria comparison method with the two Seismic Load Resisting Systems (SFRS). From the linear static analysis, dynamic analysis, and nonlinear static analysis (Pushover), representative characteristics of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) are determined. These characteristics include the structure's self-weight, target displacement, floor drifts, and seismic response modification factor (R). As a result, two buildings are obtained with different SFRS that comply with the design of their elements and checks according to the regulatory requirements. After determining the capacity curve of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) and assessing the performance level of the buildings, the conclusion is drawn that the Special Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system is more suitable and advantageous compared to the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system. This preference is due to the SPSW system's ability to provide ductility, which translates into higher energy dissipation capacity, and stiffness, which leads to reduced floor drifts in the building.","PeriodicalId":477265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).str-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this work is to compare the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system and the Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system using the AHP multi-criteria comparison method with the two Seismic Load Resisting Systems (SFRS). From the linear static analysis, dynamic analysis, and nonlinear static analysis (Pushover), representative characteristics of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) are determined. These characteristics include the structure's self-weight, target displacement, floor drifts, and seismic response modification factor (R). As a result, two buildings are obtained with different SFRS that comply with the design of their elements and checks according to the regulatory requirements. After determining the capacity curve of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) and assessing the performance level of the buildings, the conclusion is drawn that the Special Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system is more suitable and advantageous compared to the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system. This preference is due to the SPSW system's ability to provide ductility, which translates into higher energy dissipation capacity, and stiffness, which leads to reduced floor drifts in the building.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用 AHP 法对用于多功能住宅的 smf 和 spsw 钢结构建筑进行比较
本研究的目的是采用 AHP 多标准比较法,比较特殊力矩框架 (SMF) 系统和钢板剪力墙 (SPSW) 系统与两种抗震加固系统 (SFRS)。通过线性静力分析、动力分析和非线性静力分析(Pushover),确定了每种抗震加固系统(SFRS)的代表性特征。这些特征包括结构自重、目标位移、楼层漂移和地震响应修正系数 (R)。因此,两座建筑物的 SFRS 各不相同,但都符合其构件的设计,并根据法规要求进行了校核。在确定了每种抗震体系的承载力曲线并评估了建筑物的性能水平后,得出的结论是,与特殊弯矩框架(SMF)体系相比,特殊板剪力墙(SPSW)体系更合适、更有利。这是因为特殊板剪力墙系统具有延展性和刚度,延展性可转化为更高的能量消散能力,刚度可减少建筑物的楼板漂移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASSESSMENT OF SPATIAL DATA OBTAINED BY MEANS OF THE USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTH, LIME, AND GYPSUM MORTARS IN THE CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE 16TH, 17TH, AND 18TH CENTURIES LOGISTICS MODEL VS GOMPERTZ MODEL IN APPROXIMATION OF “S” CURVES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS PROJECTS COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD COMPARING THE WATER QUALITY OF STREAMS FEEDING A WATERSHED
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1