Food Thought Suppression Inventory: Item response theory and measurement invariance in Portuguese adults

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100752
Cristiana C. Marques , Kenneth Goss , Miguel Castelo-Branco , Ana T. Pereira , Paula Castilho
{"title":"Food Thought Suppression Inventory: Item response theory and measurement invariance in Portuguese adults","authors":"Cristiana C. Marques ,&nbsp;Kenneth Goss ,&nbsp;Miguel Castelo-Branco ,&nbsp;Ana T. Pereira ,&nbsp;Paula Castilho","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Food Thought Suppression Inventory (FTSI) is a 15-item measure to assess cognitive suppression related to food. The present study aimed to: 1) study the original 15-item FTSI in both women and men through item response theory (IRT), using a graded response model; 2) replicate the factor structure obtained previously in a women sample and test the measurement invariance across body mass index (BMI) groups. In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 434), the IRT model resulted in an 11-item FTSI shortened version that was equivalent across a community sample of women and men. The original FTSI was highly correlated with the FTSI short version. The short version also presented comparable correlations as the original scale in relation to body image cognitive fusion, psychological flexibility and eating psychopathology. In Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 435), confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the FTSI short version fitted the data well among women with normal weight and those with overweight/obesity, with the measure demonstrating invariance across both groups. These findings indicate that the FTSI short version, comprising the highest quality items, is a reliable and valid measure to assess food thought suppression in both women and men, and maintains the same factorial structure across women's BMI groups. Clinical implications were addressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100752"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Food Thought Suppression Inventory (FTSI) is a 15-item measure to assess cognitive suppression related to food. The present study aimed to: 1) study the original 15-item FTSI in both women and men through item response theory (IRT), using a graded response model; 2) replicate the factor structure obtained previously in a women sample and test the measurement invariance across body mass index (BMI) groups. In Study 1 (N = 434), the IRT model resulted in an 11-item FTSI shortened version that was equivalent across a community sample of women and men. The original FTSI was highly correlated with the FTSI short version. The short version also presented comparable correlations as the original scale in relation to body image cognitive fusion, psychological flexibility and eating psychopathology. In Study 2 (N = 435), confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the FTSI short version fitted the data well among women with normal weight and those with overweight/obesity, with the measure demonstrating invariance across both groups. These findings indicate that the FTSI short version, comprising the highest quality items, is a reliable and valid measure to assess food thought suppression in both women and men, and maintains the same factorial structure across women's BMI groups. Clinical implications were addressed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食物思维抑制量表:葡萄牙成年人的项目反应理论和测量不变性
食物思维抑制量表(FTSI)是一个由 15 个项目组成的量表,用于评估与食物有关的认知抑制。本研究旨在1)通过项目反应理论(IRT),采用分级反应模型,对原有的 15 个项目的 FTSI 进行男女研究;2)复制之前在女性样本中获得的因子结构,并测试不同体重指数(BMI)组的测量不变性。在研究 1(N = 434)中,IRT 模型产生了一个 11 个项目的 FTSI 简缩版,该简缩版在女性和男性的社区样本中具有等效性。原始 FTSI 与 FTSI 简本高度相关。在身体形象认知融合、心理灵活性和进食心理病理学方面,简易版与原始量表也呈现出类似的相关性。在研究 2(N = 435)中,确认性因子分析显示,FTSI 短版与体重正常女性和超重/肥胖女性的数据非常吻合,而且该量表在两个群体中都表现出不变量。这些研究结果表明,FTSI简易版包含最高质量的项目,是评估女性和男性食物想法抑制的可靠有效的测量方法,并且在女性体重指数组别中保持相同的因子结构。研究还探讨了其临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a brief, remote self-compassion intervention for employed mothers Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1