Comparing conventional abdominal ultrasound scanning versus a ROBotic assisted UltraSonography sysTem (ROBUST)

Nurul Adliah Gazali , Rafidah Abu Bakar , Celia Ia Choo Tan , Jiang Bo , Sally Hsueh Er Lee , Hui Ping Ho , Sze Ying Lim , Wei Kiong Cheong , Suet Ching Jennifer Liaw , Chin Chin Ooi
{"title":"Comparing conventional abdominal ultrasound scanning versus a ROBotic assisted UltraSonography sysTem (ROBUST)","authors":"Nurul Adliah Gazali ,&nbsp;Rafidah Abu Bakar ,&nbsp;Celia Ia Choo Tan ,&nbsp;Jiang Bo ,&nbsp;Sally Hsueh Er Lee ,&nbsp;Hui Ping Ho ,&nbsp;Sze Ying Lim ,&nbsp;Wei Kiong Cheong ,&nbsp;Suet Ching Jennifer Liaw ,&nbsp;Chin Chin Ooi","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2024.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) among sonographers is a major problem with a high prevalence rate of more than 80% in North America and United Kingdom. In Singapore, this is particularly relevant because statistics have showed WRMSD accounted for 60% of all confirmed occupational diseases cases. The ROBotic UltraSonography sysTem (ROBUST) was developed to overcome the WRMSD challenges sonographers faced in their daily clinical practice and, more importantly, increase their career longevity and productivity.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of ROBUST in producing diagnostic images equivalent to conventional ultrasound (US) scans and to assess its clinical feasibility and receptiveness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 50 adult patients from two tertiary hospitals underwent conventional abdominal US followed by ROBUST scans. Six sonographers performed the US scans using the standard protocol. Four expert readers, blinded to the scanning methods, graded the image quality of 2,218 images (1,317 conventional, 901 ROBUST). Surveys were distributed immediately after the scan to assess the patient’s and sonographers’ opinions on maneuverability, pain, and comfort.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Wilcoxon signed rank test showed no significant difference between conventional US and ROBUST for image quality (<em>p</em> = 0.317). Sixteen (16/50 = 32%) patients responded feeling slight to moderate pain when scanned by ROBUST (<em>p</em> = 0.251). All the sonographers felt that the imaging task using ROBUST was not physically strenuous. One sonographer felt that the ROBUST was easy to manipulate; two were neutral (<em>p</em> = 0.007), and three experienced difficulties manipulating the ROBUST.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ROBUST can produce diagnostic images equivalent to conventional scans. It is feasible in clinical settings with good acceptance by sonographers and patients. Adoption of this innovation in clinical practice could potentially increase career longevity and productivity by alleviating pain and discomfort experienced by sonographers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000089/pdfft?md5=bab49dd49d0a6248007158278e30adf4&pid=1-s2.0-S2949668324000089-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) among sonographers is a major problem with a high prevalence rate of more than 80% in North America and United Kingdom. In Singapore, this is particularly relevant because statistics have showed WRMSD accounted for 60% of all confirmed occupational diseases cases. The ROBotic UltraSonography sysTem (ROBUST) was developed to overcome the WRMSD challenges sonographers faced in their daily clinical practice and, more importantly, increase their career longevity and productivity.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of ROBUST in producing diagnostic images equivalent to conventional ultrasound (US) scans and to assess its clinical feasibility and receptiveness.

Methods

A total of 50 adult patients from two tertiary hospitals underwent conventional abdominal US followed by ROBUST scans. Six sonographers performed the US scans using the standard protocol. Four expert readers, blinded to the scanning methods, graded the image quality of 2,218 images (1,317 conventional, 901 ROBUST). Surveys were distributed immediately after the scan to assess the patient’s and sonographers’ opinions on maneuverability, pain, and comfort.

Results

Wilcoxon signed rank test showed no significant difference between conventional US and ROBUST for image quality (p = 0.317). Sixteen (16/50 = 32%) patients responded feeling slight to moderate pain when scanned by ROBUST (p = 0.251). All the sonographers felt that the imaging task using ROBUST was not physically strenuous. One sonographer felt that the ROBUST was easy to manipulate; two were neutral (p = 0.007), and three experienced difficulties manipulating the ROBUST.

Conclusion

ROBUST can produce diagnostic images equivalent to conventional scans. It is feasible in clinical settings with good acceptance by sonographers and patients. Adoption of this innovation in clinical practice could potentially increase career longevity and productivity by alleviating pain and discomfort experienced by sonographers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统腹部超声扫描与机器人辅助超声造影系统(ROBUST)的比较
背景超声技师中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WRMSD)是一个主要问题,在北美和英国的发病率高达 80% 以上。在新加坡,这一问题尤为突出,因为统计数字显示,在所有确诊的职业病病例中,与肌肉骨骼相关的疾病占 60%。ROBUST 是为克服超声技师在日常临床实践中面临的 WRMSD 挑战而开发的,更重要的是,它能延长超声技师的职业寿命并提高他们的工作效率。 Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of ROBUST in producing diagnostic images equivalent to conventional ultrasound (US) scans and to assess its clinical feasibility and receptiveness.Methods 两家三甲医院共 50 名成年患者接受了常规腹部 US 扫描,随后接受了 ROBUST 扫描。六名超声技师按照标准方案进行了超声扫描。四位对扫描方法保密的专家对 2,218 张图像(1,317 张常规图像,901 张 ROBUST 图像)的图像质量进行了评分。扫描后立即发放调查问卷,以评估患者和超声技师对操作性、疼痛和舒适度的意见。结果Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示,传统 US 和 ROBUST 在图像质量上没有显著差异(p = 0.317)。16名(16/50 = 32%)患者反应在使用 ROBUST 扫描时感到轻微至中度疼痛(p = 0.251)。所有超声技师都认为使用 ROBUST 进行成像工作并不费力。一名超声技师认为 ROBUST 易于操作;两名超声技师持中立态度(p = 0.007),三名超声技师在操作 ROBUST 时遇到困难。它在临床环境中是可行的,超声技师和患者都能很好地接受。在临床实践中采用这一创新技术可以减轻超声技师的疼痛和不适,从而延长他们的职业寿命,提高工作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI Treatment of inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with focused ultrasound and microbubbles in patients receiving chemotherapy Breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation using improved 3DUnet++ Utilization of evoked vibrational signatures under ultrasound examination as a novel method of tissue classification Protocol refinement and inter- and intra-rater reliability assessment of ultrasound-based measurements of hamstring architecture, and echo intensity, and intra-rater reliability of shear wave elastography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1