Current opinion on large-scale prospective myomectomy databases toward evidence-based preconception and antenatal counselling utilising a standardised myomectomy operation note.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.16.4.006
S M Strong, A A McDougall, A M Abdelmohsen, A Maku, A Dehnel, R Mallick, F Odejinmi
{"title":"Current opinion on large-scale prospective myomectomy databases toward evidence-based preconception and antenatal counselling utilising a standardised myomectomy operation note.","authors":"S M Strong, A A McDougall, A M Abdelmohsen, A Maku, A Dehnel, R Mallick, F Odejinmi","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.4.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No large-scale databases exist of pregnancy outcomes and rate of uterine rupture for women after myomectomy, resulting in inconsistent antenatal counselling and decision-making regarding mode and timing of delivery. Standardising information collected at myomectomy may facilitate data collection, informing prenatal/ antenatal counselling.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine clinician opinions regarding standardisation of myomectomy operation notes to allow comprehensive data input into a prospective database of pregnancy outcomes, toward an evidence-based approach to decision making regarding timing and mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A google forms survey was emailed to all consultant (attending-level) obstetricians and gynaecologists across 25 hospitals in London, Kent, Surrey, and Sussex (UK) between March and May 2022. To enhance response rates, two further email reminders were sent alongside in-person reminders from selected local unit representatives.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Senior clinician opinion for characteristics necessary to collect at time of surgery to develop a widescale database of post myomectomy pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>209/475 (44%) responses received; 95% (198/209) agreed with standardising operation notes. Criteria selected for inclusion included cavity breach (98%, 194/198), location (98%, 194/198), number of fibroids removed (93%, 185/198) and number of uterine incisions (96%, 190/198).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gynaecologists support standardising myomectomy operation notes to inform the development of prospective large-scale databases of pregnancy outcomes after myomectomy.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Acquisition of clinician opinions on the development and content of a standardised myomectomy operation note to aid the development of a pregnancy-outcome database for women after myomectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 1","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11198879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.4.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No large-scale databases exist of pregnancy outcomes and rate of uterine rupture for women after myomectomy, resulting in inconsistent antenatal counselling and decision-making regarding mode and timing of delivery. Standardising information collected at myomectomy may facilitate data collection, informing prenatal/ antenatal counselling.

Objectives: To determine clinician opinions regarding standardisation of myomectomy operation notes to allow comprehensive data input into a prospective database of pregnancy outcomes, toward an evidence-based approach to decision making regarding timing and mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancies.

Materials and methods: A google forms survey was emailed to all consultant (attending-level) obstetricians and gynaecologists across 25 hospitals in London, Kent, Surrey, and Sussex (UK) between March and May 2022. To enhance response rates, two further email reminders were sent alongside in-person reminders from selected local unit representatives.

Main outcome measures: Senior clinician opinion for characteristics necessary to collect at time of surgery to develop a widescale database of post myomectomy pregnancy outcomes.

Results: 209/475 (44%) responses received; 95% (198/209) agreed with standardising operation notes. Criteria selected for inclusion included cavity breach (98%, 194/198), location (98%, 194/198), number of fibroids removed (93%, 185/198) and number of uterine incisions (96%, 190/198).

Conclusions: Gynaecologists support standardising myomectomy operation notes to inform the development of prospective large-scale databases of pregnancy outcomes after myomectomy.

What is new?: Acquisition of clinician opinions on the development and content of a standardised myomectomy operation note to aid the development of a pregnancy-outcome database for women after myomectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于大规模前瞻性子宫肌瘤切除术数据库的当前观点,利用标准化子宫肌瘤切除术手术记录,开展循证孕前和产前咨询。
背景:目前还没有关于子宫肌瘤剔除术后妇女妊娠结局和子宫破裂率的大规模数据库,导致产前咨询和分娩方式及时机决策不一致。将子宫肌瘤剔除术时收集的信息标准化可促进数据收集,为产前/产后咨询提供依据:目的:确定临床医生对子宫肌瘤剔除术手术记录标准化的意见,以便将全面的数据输入妊娠结局前瞻性数据库,从而为后续妊娠的分娩时间和方式决策提供循证方法:2022 年 3 月至 5 月期间,通过电子邮件向英国伦敦、肯特、萨里和苏塞克斯 25 家医院的所有妇产科顾问(主治医师)发送了谷歌表格调查。为提高回复率,我们还发送了两封邮件提醒,并由选定的当地单位代表亲自进行提醒:结果:收到 209/475 份回复(44%);95%(198/209)同意标准化手术记录。选择纳入的标准包括子宫腔破损(98%,194/198)、位置(98%,194/198)、肌瘤剔除数量(93%,185/198)和子宫切口数量(96%,190/198):妇科医生支持对子宫肌瘤剔除术手术记录进行标准化,以便为开发子宫肌瘤剔除术后妊娠结局的前瞻性大规模数据库提供信息:就标准化子宫肌瘤剔除术手术记录的开发和内容征求临床医生的意见,以帮助开发子宫肌瘤剔除术后妇女妊娠结局数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence, the ChatGPT Large Language Model: Assessing the Accuracy of Responses to the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) Level 1-2 knowledge tests. Comparison between learning curves of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology: a systematic review. Complete bicorporeal uterus, double cervix, longitudinal obstructing vaginal septum: an integrated approach for one-stop diagnosis and ultrasound-guided endoscopic hymen-sparing treatment. Complications of electrosurgery: mechanisms and prevention strategies. European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) Good Practice Recommendations on surgical techniques for Removal of Fibroids: Part 2 Hysteroscopic Myomectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1