Exploring gender dynamics: multigroup analysis of workplace persuasion and intimate co-creation using structural equation modeling

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1108/jmd-10-2023-0304
Muhammad Umar Shahzad
{"title":"Exploring gender dynamics: multigroup analysis of workplace persuasion and intimate co-creation using structural equation modeling","authors":"Muhammad Umar Shahzad","doi":"10.1108/jmd-10-2023-0304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOne of the novel concepts in the management literature is intimate co-creation. Considering it as the outcome of workplace persuasion, this study examines its effect via team-member exchange and ethical climate for the assessment of multigroup analysis. Finding a relationship among variables is not the core objective of the study. The core objective was to assess multigroup analysis for examining measurement scales' uniformity or perceptual differences across the male and female groups using measurement invariance.Design/methodology/approachThis was a quantitative study for a survey of faculty members from the top 10 Pakistani universities. It employed state-of-the-art statistical techniques, including the application of the foundational social exchange theory and the utilization of multigroup analysis in structural equation modeling (SEM) with the Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS). The research methodology was designed to investigate the relationships between workplace persuasion, ethical climate, team member exchange and intimate co-creation. A specific emphasis was placed on assessing whether gender influences these relationships consistently across male and female groups, as determined by measurement invariance tests.FindingsThis study underscores the significant impact of ethical persuasion in the workplace on enhancing intimate co-creation among individuals, offering invaluable insights for organizational leaders. Importantly, it emphasizes that gender dynamics do not influence this relationship, underscoring the imperative of addressing gender-related workplace issues to optimize intimate co-creation. This holds particular relevance for service-based organizations, such as universities in this case.Originality/valueThis study makes a significant contribution by exploring the concept of intimate co-creation within the realm of organizational science, while also highlighting the crucial importance of considering workplace gender dynamics. It offers fresh insights into how these dynamics influence group creativity, guiding human resource practices toward fostering innovation within gender-inclusive workplaces. These insights gain added relevance in the evolving post-COVID-19 era and in the context of AI integration. Notably, a distinctive contribution of this study to social exchange theory lies in its innovative application of multigroup analysis to variables related to gender.","PeriodicalId":48006,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-10-2023-0304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeOne of the novel concepts in the management literature is intimate co-creation. Considering it as the outcome of workplace persuasion, this study examines its effect via team-member exchange and ethical climate for the assessment of multigroup analysis. Finding a relationship among variables is not the core objective of the study. The core objective was to assess multigroup analysis for examining measurement scales' uniformity or perceptual differences across the male and female groups using measurement invariance.Design/methodology/approachThis was a quantitative study for a survey of faculty members from the top 10 Pakistani universities. It employed state-of-the-art statistical techniques, including the application of the foundational social exchange theory and the utilization of multigroup analysis in structural equation modeling (SEM) with the Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS). The research methodology was designed to investigate the relationships between workplace persuasion, ethical climate, team member exchange and intimate co-creation. A specific emphasis was placed on assessing whether gender influences these relationships consistently across male and female groups, as determined by measurement invariance tests.FindingsThis study underscores the significant impact of ethical persuasion in the workplace on enhancing intimate co-creation among individuals, offering invaluable insights for organizational leaders. Importantly, it emphasizes that gender dynamics do not influence this relationship, underscoring the imperative of addressing gender-related workplace issues to optimize intimate co-creation. This holds particular relevance for service-based organizations, such as universities in this case.Originality/valueThis study makes a significant contribution by exploring the concept of intimate co-creation within the realm of organizational science, while also highlighting the crucial importance of considering workplace gender dynamics. It offers fresh insights into how these dynamics influence group creativity, guiding human resource practices toward fostering innovation within gender-inclusive workplaces. These insights gain added relevance in the evolving post-COVID-19 era and in the context of AI integration. Notably, a distinctive contribution of this study to social exchange theory lies in its innovative application of multigroup analysis to variables related to gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索性别动态:利用结构方程模型对工作场所说服和亲密共创进行多组分析
目的 亲密共创是管理文献中的一个新概念。考虑到亲密共创是工作场所说服的结果,本研究通过团队成员交流和道德氛围来研究亲密共创对多组分析评估的影响。寻找变量之间的关系并不是本研究的核心目标。核心目标是评估多组分析,利用测量不变量来检查测量量表的统一性或男女组之间的感知差异。研究采用了最先进的统计技术,包括应用基础社会交换理论,以及在结构方程模型(SEM)中利用矩结构分析(AMOS)进行多组分析。研究方法旨在调查工作场所说服、道德氛围、团队成员交流和亲密共创之间的关系。研究结果这项研究强调了工作场所中的道德劝说对加强个人之间亲密共创的重要影响,为组织领导者提供了宝贵的见解。重要的是,它强调了性别动态并不影响这种关系,突出了解决与性别相关的工作场所问题以优化亲密共创的必要性。这项研究通过在组织科学领域探索亲密共创的概念做出了重要贡献,同时也强调了考虑工作场所性别动态的极端重要性。它提供了关于这些动态因素如何影响群体创造力的新见解,指导人力资源实践在性别包容的工作场所中促进创新。在不断发展的后 COVID-19 时代和人工智能一体化的背景下,这些见解更具现实意义。值得注意的是,本研究对社会交换理论的一个独特贡献在于,它创新性地将多群体分析应用于与性别相关的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: ■Competence-based management development ■Developing leadership skills ■Developing women for management ■Global management ■The new technology of management development The Journal of Management Development draws together the thinking and research relating to the role played by managers in their immediate environment, and the ways in which they can widen their responsibilities to take on larger roles. Many companies now appreciate that investment in management development helps to reduce costs, increase sales and improve productivity - so it"s well worth investigating.
期刊最新文献
Unleashing potential: how alpha female status shape extra-role performance across life's stages and marital roles Evolving needs of learners and role of artificial intelligence (AI) in training and development (T&D): T&D professionals' perspective Employee disengagement: the catalytic role of leader-induced defensive cognitions and perceptual politics Competencies displayed by multinational corporation senior managers in critical business situations Connection is a power: exploring the dynamic interaction between social and psychological capital in fostering innovative behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1