From zen to stigma: Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, and their cross-cultural links to mental health

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Counseling and Development Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1002/jcad.12514
Yi-Ying Lin, Dena Phillips Swanson, Ronald D. Rogge
{"title":"From zen to stigma: Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, and their cross-cultural links to mental health","authors":"Yi-Ying Lin,&nbsp;Dena Phillips Swanson,&nbsp;Ronald D. Rogge","doi":"10.1002/jcad.12514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stigma remains a significant barrier preventing individuals from seeking the support they need, particularly for individuals with East Asian heritages. To explore potential mechanisms, this study examined links from East Asian ideologies to mental health help-seeking attitudes and peace of mind across five cultural groups: 322 respondents in China, 400 in Japan, 362 in Taiwan, 319 Asian Americans, and 688 white Americans. The three teachings of East Asia accounted for 31%–85% of the cross-cultural differences in mental health attitudes and peace of mind. Empowering Confucian tenets (self-cultivation, leading by example, and human heartedness), Taoism, and Buddhism all uniquely predicted greater peace of mind across most of the groups. Empowering Confucianism also predicted lower mental health stigma whereas Buddhism predicted greater stigma. Finally, Restrictive Confucian tenets (e.g., interpersonal harmony, propriety, and relational hierarchy) predicted greater stigma and lower peace of mind. Implications for addressing stigma/resistance within treatment and for promoting mental health across cultures are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcad.12514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stigma remains a significant barrier preventing individuals from seeking the support they need, particularly for individuals with East Asian heritages. To explore potential mechanisms, this study examined links from East Asian ideologies to mental health help-seeking attitudes and peace of mind across five cultural groups: 322 respondents in China, 400 in Japan, 362 in Taiwan, 319 Asian Americans, and 688 white Americans. The three teachings of East Asia accounted for 31%–85% of the cross-cultural differences in mental health attitudes and peace of mind. Empowering Confucian tenets (self-cultivation, leading by example, and human heartedness), Taoism, and Buddhism all uniquely predicted greater peace of mind across most of the groups. Empowering Confucianism also predicted lower mental health stigma whereas Buddhism predicted greater stigma. Finally, Restrictive Confucian tenets (e.g., interpersonal harmony, propriety, and relational hierarchy) predicted greater stigma and lower peace of mind. Implications for addressing stigma/resistance within treatment and for promoting mental health across cultures are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从禅宗到成见:佛教、道教、儒教及其与心理健康的跨文化联系
污名化仍然是阻碍人们寻求所需支持的一个重要障碍,对于具有东亚血统的人来说尤其如此。为了探索潜在的机制,本研究考察了东亚意识形态与五个文化群体的心理健康求助态度和心态平和之间的联系:322 名中国受访者、400 名日本受访者、362 名台湾受访者、319 名亚裔美国人和 688 名白人美国人。在心理健康态度和心态平和方面的跨文化差异中,东亚三教占 31%-85% 的比例。儒家思想(修身、以身作则和以人为本)、道家思想和佛家思想在大多数群体中都能独特地预测出更高的心态平和度。赋权型儒家思想也预示着较低的心理健康耻辱感,而佛教则预示着更大的耻辱感。最后,儒家的限制性信条(如人际和谐、礼仪和关系等级)预示着更大的污名化和更低的心境平和。本文讨论了在治疗过程中解决污名化/阻力问题以及促进跨文化心理健康的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Counseling & Development publishes practice, theory, and research articles across 18 different specialty areas and work settings. Sections include research, assessment and diagnosis, theory and practice, and trends.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Improving treatment fidelity: Factors that predict trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy component use An exploration of counselors of color working in the eating disorder field Psychometric synthesis of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) School counselors' burnout, hope, and self-efficacy: A sequential regression analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1