Form and Characteristics of Miniature farming Tools in the Geum River Basin

Sangwon Lee
{"title":"Form and Characteristics of Miniature farming Tools in the Geum River Basin","authors":"Sangwon Lee","doi":"10.34268/hskk.2024.57.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These days, relics that used to have regional specificity tend to deviate from their specificity due to the active cultural property excavation research. It is necessary to recognize the newly identified area. Therefore, among the archaeological materials that strongly reflect regional specificity, we paid attention to the Miniature farming tools accumulated around the Geum River basin. The Miniature farming tools can be divided into ttabi type, cheolseo type, iron axe type, and sickle type. Data from the Geum River basin also show high excavation rates for Iron Axe type and sickle type, although the warm and cheolseo type are also identified. Cheoljun is one of the characteristic iron artifacts excavated from the Geum River basin. Compared to the Daegaya sphere, this was identified as a ttabi-type Miniature farming tool, and the plane shape and cross-sectional shape were considered to be more likely to have been produced under the influence of the Daegaya sphere rather than generated and produced within the Geum River basin. Iron axe-type Miniature farming tools are again divided into I-shaped and V-shaped in crosssectional form, and the I-shaped is the same as or similar to those confirmed in the Daegaya sphere, so it is thought to be highly relevant. On the other hand, the V-shaped is also excavated from the remains of the Proto-Three Kingdoms Period, which is confirmed around the Geum River basin, and is similar to the form of Iron axe, which has been produced and used for a long time, so it is thought that the traditional method was inherited. Although there is a limit to linking data excavated from the Geum River basin with Miniature farming tools excavated from the Daegaya sphere, data that are likely to have been produced in a manner similar to that of the Daegaya sphere in both plane and cross-sectional shapes were identified. From these data, it can be seen that there are also data that are more likely to have flowed into Baekje sphere from Daegaya sphere than from Baekje sphere.","PeriodicalId":131051,"journal":{"name":"The hoseo Archaeological Society","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The hoseo Archaeological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34268/hskk.2024.57.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These days, relics that used to have regional specificity tend to deviate from their specificity due to the active cultural property excavation research. It is necessary to recognize the newly identified area. Therefore, among the archaeological materials that strongly reflect regional specificity, we paid attention to the Miniature farming tools accumulated around the Geum River basin. The Miniature farming tools can be divided into ttabi type, cheolseo type, iron axe type, and sickle type. Data from the Geum River basin also show high excavation rates for Iron Axe type and sickle type, although the warm and cheolseo type are also identified. Cheoljun is one of the characteristic iron artifacts excavated from the Geum River basin. Compared to the Daegaya sphere, this was identified as a ttabi-type Miniature farming tool, and the plane shape and cross-sectional shape were considered to be more likely to have been produced under the influence of the Daegaya sphere rather than generated and produced within the Geum River basin. Iron axe-type Miniature farming tools are again divided into I-shaped and V-shaped in crosssectional form, and the I-shaped is the same as or similar to those confirmed in the Daegaya sphere, so it is thought to be highly relevant. On the other hand, the V-shaped is also excavated from the remains of the Proto-Three Kingdoms Period, which is confirmed around the Geum River basin, and is similar to the form of Iron axe, which has been produced and used for a long time, so it is thought that the traditional method was inherited. Although there is a limit to linking data excavated from the Geum River basin with Miniature farming tools excavated from the Daegaya sphere, data that are likely to have been produced in a manner similar to that of the Daegaya sphere in both plane and cross-sectional shapes were identified. From these data, it can be seen that there are also data that are more likely to have flowed into Baekje sphere from Daegaya sphere than from Baekje sphere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金河流域微型农具的形态和特征
如今,由于文化财产发掘研究的活跃,过去具有区域特异性的文物往往会偏离其特异性。有必要对新确定的区域进行确认。因此,在强烈反映出地域特征的考古材料中,我们关注了金河流域周边积累的微型农具。微型农具可分为 Ttabi 型、Cheolseo 型、铁斧型和镰刀型。金河流域的数据还显示,铁斧型和镰刀型的出土率较高,但也发现了温斧型和铁斧型。哲钧是金河流域出土的特色铁器之一。与大谷球相比,它被认定为塔比型微型农具,其平面形状和横截面形状被认为更有可能是在大谷球的影响下产生的,而不是在金河流域产生和生产的。铁斧类微型农具在断面形状上又分为I形和V形,I形与大谷球体中确认的农具相同或相似,因此认为其相关性较高。另一方面,V 形也是从金河流域一带确认的原三国时代的遗物中出土的,与长期生产和使用的铁斧形式相似,因此认为是继承了传统的方法。虽然将金河流域出土的资料与大谷球出土的微型农具联系起来有一定的局限性,但还是找出了在平面和断面形状上可能与大谷球的制作方法相似的资料。从这些数据中可以看出,与百济球相比,也有一些数据更有可能是从大谷球流入百济球的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Form and Characteristics of Miniature farming Tools in the Geum River Basin Changes in Plan and Hierarchy in the Building of the Woongjin period of Baekje A Study of the Bone Arrowheads from Korean Peninsula and Northeast China A speculation on the Mid-Pleistocene Hominin occupation of the Korean peninsula: A new discovery from the Sannori site at Nonsan City The production location and significance of the “inscription sword”owned by the National Museum of Tokyo, Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1