2022 CEOS International Thermal Infrared Radiometer Comparison: Part II: Field Comparison of Radiometers

Yoshiro Yamada, Subrena Harris, Werenfrid Wimmer, Raymond Holmes, Tim Nightingale, Arrow Lee, Nis Jepsen, Nicole Morgan, F. Göttsche, R. Niclós, Martín Perelló, V. García-Santos, Craig Donlon, Nigel Fox
{"title":"2022 CEOS International Thermal Infrared Radiometer Comparison: Part II: Field Comparison of Radiometers","authors":"Yoshiro Yamada, Subrena Harris, Werenfrid Wimmer, Raymond Holmes, Tim Nightingale, Arrow Lee, Nis Jepsen, Nicole Morgan, F. Göttsche, R. Niclós, Martín Perelló, V. García-Santos, Craig Donlon, Nigel Fox","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0060.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAn international comparison of field-deployed radiometers for sea surface skin temperature (SSTskin) retrieval was conducted during two weeks in June 2022. The comparison comprised a laboratory comparison and a field comparison. The field comparison of the radiometers took place on the second week at a seaside pier on the south coast of England. Six thermal infrared radiometers were compared against each other while continuously viewing the closely adjacent surface of the sea from the end of the pier. This paper reports the results of this field comparison.\nAll participants’ radiometers agreed with the reference value, evaluated as the simple mean of the participant reported values, within the claimed uncertainties. The SSTskin variation during the five-day period was within 3 °C around 18.3 °C, which is two times larger in range than in the previous comparison in 2016, while the mean of the difference from the reference value over the period evaluated for each participant, was found to be within 0.07 °C, which is a two-times improvement on the previous results.\nDuring the comparison an insignificant but noticeable abrupt shift in measured value occurred in one of the radiometers, which could not have been detected without comparison with other instruments. This demonstrated the effectiveness of having long term stable internal reference sources in the instrument, a feature this particular radiometer did not have.\nThe combined results from the laboratory comparison and the field comparison contribute to improve confidence in the retrieved SSTskin.","PeriodicalId":507668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0060.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An international comparison of field-deployed radiometers for sea surface skin temperature (SSTskin) retrieval was conducted during two weeks in June 2022. The comparison comprised a laboratory comparison and a field comparison. The field comparison of the radiometers took place on the second week at a seaside pier on the south coast of England. Six thermal infrared radiometers were compared against each other while continuously viewing the closely adjacent surface of the sea from the end of the pier. This paper reports the results of this field comparison. All participants’ radiometers agreed with the reference value, evaluated as the simple mean of the participant reported values, within the claimed uncertainties. The SSTskin variation during the five-day period was within 3 °C around 18.3 °C, which is two times larger in range than in the previous comparison in 2016, while the mean of the difference from the reference value over the period evaluated for each participant, was found to be within 0.07 °C, which is a two-times improvement on the previous results. During the comparison an insignificant but noticeable abrupt shift in measured value occurred in one of the radiometers, which could not have been detected without comparison with other instruments. This demonstrated the effectiveness of having long term stable internal reference sources in the instrument, a feature this particular radiometer did not have. The combined results from the laboratory comparison and the field comparison contribute to improve confidence in the retrieved SSTskin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022 CEOS 国际热红外辐射计比较:第二部分:辐射计实地比较
2022 年 6 月的两周时间里,对用于海面表皮温度(SSTskin)检索的实地部署辐射计进行了国际比较。比较包括实验室比较和实地比较。辐射计的实地对比于第二周在英格兰南部海岸的一个海滨码头进行。六台热红外辐射计进行了相互比较,同时从码头末端连续观察紧邻的海面。所有参赛者的辐射计都与参考值一致,参考值是参赛者报告值的简单平均值,不超过所声称的不确定性。在五天的时间里,SSTskin 在 18.3 ℃ 左右的变化范围在 3 ℃ 以内,比 2016 年的上一次比对结果大两倍,而每个参与者在评估期间与参考值的差值平均值在 0.07 ℃ 以内,比上一次结果提高了两倍。在比对期间,其中一台辐射计的测量值发生了微小但明显的突然变化,如果不与其他仪器进行比对,是无法发现的。实验室对比和实地对比的综合结果有助于提高对所获取的 SSTskin 的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Quality Control Method of Surface Temperature Observations for Complex Physical Geography Estimates of Baroclinic Tidal Sea Level and Currents from Lagrangian Drifters and Satellite Altimetry Reconstruction of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness and Its Impact on Sea Ice Forecasting in the Melting Season Continuous peak period estimates from discrete surface-wave spectra Eddy detection inverted from Argo profiles to surface altimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1