Use of artificial hydration in patients diagnosed with senility as the cause of death by home care physicians: A cross₋sectional study

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of General and Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1002/jgf2.681
Teruhiko Imanaga MD, PhD
{"title":"Use of artificial hydration in patients diagnosed with senility as the cause of death by home care physicians: A cross₋sectional study","authors":"Teruhiko Imanaga MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency, effectiveness, and reasons for the use of artificial hydration (AH) in senile patients in the last week, and patient-related factors associated with its usage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between April and May 2023, I conducted a cross₋sectional study among medical institutions affiliated with the Japan Network of Home Care Supporting Clinics. Eligible cases included those in which senility was listed as the cause of death on the death certificate from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. The questions asked use of AH, reasons for AH, and symptoms that improved or worsened with AH. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, place of death, length of treatment, and complication of dementia, were also asked. Descriptive statistics were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the association between patient characteristics and the use of AH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-three medical institutions (12.5%) provided responses, contributing a total of 714 cases. AH was administered in 236 cases (33.1%). The most common reason was “due to family preference” in 110 cases (46.6%). One hundred thirty-five cases (57.2%) reported “no improved symptoms,” while symptom worsening was reported as “no worsened symptoms” in 176 cases (74.6%). Multivariate analysis on 699 cases using complete-case analysis identified age (risk ratio [RR]:0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–0.99) and female (RR:0.73, 95% CI:0.58–0.92) as factors associated with the use of AH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed that AH was commonly used based on family preferences and to alleviate psychological burdens on the family.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.681","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgf2.681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency, effectiveness, and reasons for the use of artificial hydration (AH) in senile patients in the last week, and patient-related factors associated with its usage.

Methods

Between April and May 2023, I conducted a cross₋sectional study among medical institutions affiliated with the Japan Network of Home Care Supporting Clinics. Eligible cases included those in which senility was listed as the cause of death on the death certificate from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. The questions asked use of AH, reasons for AH, and symptoms that improved or worsened with AH. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, place of death, length of treatment, and complication of dementia, were also asked. Descriptive statistics were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the association between patient characteristics and the use of AH.

Results

Eighty-three medical institutions (12.5%) provided responses, contributing a total of 714 cases. AH was administered in 236 cases (33.1%). The most common reason was “due to family preference” in 110 cases (46.6%). One hundred thirty-five cases (57.2%) reported “no improved symptoms,” while symptom worsening was reported as “no worsened symptoms” in 176 cases (74.6%). Multivariate analysis on 699 cases using complete-case analysis identified age (risk ratio [RR]:0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–0.99) and female (RR:0.73, 95% CI:0.58–0.92) as factors associated with the use of AH.

Conclusion

This study revealed that AH was commonly used based on family preferences and to alleviate psychological burdens on the family.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭护理医生对被诊断为死因是衰老的患者使用人工补液:横断面研究
本研究旨在调查老年患者在最后一周使用人工补液(AH)的频率、效果和原因,以及与使用人工补液相关的患者相关因素。2023 年 4 月至 5 月期间,我在日本家庭护理支持诊所网络的附属医疗机构中开展了一项横断面研究。符合条件的病例包括 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间死亡证明上将衰老列为死因的病例。调查问题包括:AH 的使用情况、AH 的原因、AH 后症状的改善或恶化情况。此外,还询问了患者的特征,包括年龄、性别、死亡地点、治疗时间和痴呆并发症。研究人员进行了描述性统计。有 83 家医疗机构(12.5%)提供了回复,共计 714 个病例。有 236 个病例(33.1%)使用了 AH。最常见的原因是 "出于家庭偏好",有 110 例(46.6%)。135例(57.2%)报告 "症状无改善",176例(74.6%)报告 "症状无恶化"。通过对 699 个病例进行完整病例多变量分析,发现年龄(风险比 [RR]:0.98,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.96-0.99)和女性(RR:0.73,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.58-0.92)与使用 AH 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Assessment and management of allergic rhinitis: A review and evidence‐informed approach for family medicine Identification of atypical hypoglycemia via continuous glucose monitoring in a patient presenting with hot flashes Computed tomography findings of 50 patients diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia: A case series Significance of acupuncture treatment for medical staff with low back pain: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1