University-led dialogues with society: balancing informing and listening?

Nina de Roo, Tamara Metze, C. Leeuwis
{"title":"University-led dialogues with society: balancing informing and listening?","authors":"Nina de Roo, Tamara Metze, C. Leeuwis","doi":"10.22323/2.23010802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn response to a growing understanding that scientific knowledge is not always trusted at face value, many universities organise dialogues to `open up' to society. In four exploratory case studies at the Dutch Wageningen University & Research, we looked into the adherence to dialogue principles and the roles that researchers performed while engaging in dialogues. We found that researchers face three challenges when interacting with societal stakeholders in dialogues: (1) moving from knowledge provider to “letting in” and listening to different perspectives (2) balancing attention toward knowledge with attention toward values and emotions (3) navigating different aspired and perceived roles of researchers in dialogue (e.g. Pure Scientist versus Issue Advocate).","PeriodicalId":501088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Communication","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23010802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to a growing understanding that scientific knowledge is not always trusted at face value, many universities organise dialogues to `open up' to society. In four exploratory case studies at the Dutch Wageningen University & Research, we looked into the adherence to dialogue principles and the roles that researchers performed while engaging in dialogues. We found that researchers face three challenges when interacting with societal stakeholders in dialogues: (1) moving from knowledge provider to “letting in” and listening to different perspectives (2) balancing attention toward knowledge with attention toward values and emotions (3) navigating different aspired and perceived roles of researchers in dialogue (e.g. Pure Scientist versus Issue Advocate).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学主导的与社会的对话:平衡告知与倾听?
人们越来越认识到,科学知识的表面价值并不总是值得信赖的,因此许多大学组织对话,向社会 "敞开大门"。在荷兰瓦赫宁根大学与研究所的四项探索性案例研究中,我们考察了对话原则的遵守情况以及研究人员在参与对话时所扮演的角色。我们发现,研究人员在对话中与社会利益相关者互动时面临三项挑战:(1) 从知识提供者转变为 "融入 "者,倾听不同的观点 (2) 平衡对知识的关注与对价值观和情感的关注 (3) 在对话中驾驭研究人员的不同期望和认知角色(如纯粹的科学家与问题倡导者)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Citizen science and science communication: toward a more inclusive pattern? #AISCICOMM24. Discussing the role of (generative) AI for science communication research and science communication practice International Symposium on Public Communication of Science and Technology in Zacatecas, Mexico: between diversity, inclusion and pending questions Science journalism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: news sources engagement and [lack of] science accountability Exploring the behavioral mechanisms of Chinese scientists' public engagement with science based on an integrative model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1