Tilted Balance to Security or Economy? A Comparative Study of National Security Review Mechanisms in the Netherlands and the United States

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW European Company Law Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.54648/eucl2024002
Harold Koster, Yao Yuan
{"title":"Tilted Balance to Security or Economy? A Comparative Study of National Security Review Mechanisms in the Netherlands and the United States","authors":"Harold Koster, Yao Yuan","doi":"10.54648/eucl2024002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Netherlands and the United States (US) stand as strong allies, united by a robust commitment to democratic norms and market principles that anchor a more open, fair, and market-led global economy. Their prosperity has been founded on free trade and investments. However, with the evolving dynamics in global geoeconomics and geopolitics in recent years, both nations have introduced or enhanced their national security review mechanisms. Given their shared attributes, this article compares the review mechanisms of the two countries and explores whether the new Dutch national security review system will mirror the regime of the US or introduce distinct innovations. It also explores the reasons behind each nation’s different preferences regarding the balance between economy and security.\nForeign Direct Investment, National Security, Economic Security, Investment Screening, the Netherlands, the United States, Comparative Research","PeriodicalId":11843,"journal":{"name":"European Company Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Company Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eucl2024002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Netherlands and the United States (US) stand as strong allies, united by a robust commitment to democratic norms and market principles that anchor a more open, fair, and market-led global economy. Their prosperity has been founded on free trade and investments. However, with the evolving dynamics in global geoeconomics and geopolitics in recent years, both nations have introduced or enhanced their national security review mechanisms. Given their shared attributes, this article compares the review mechanisms of the two countries and explores whether the new Dutch national security review system will mirror the regime of the US or introduce distinct innovations. It also explores the reasons behind each nation’s different preferences regarding the balance between economy and security. Foreign Direct Investment, National Security, Economic Security, Investment Screening, the Netherlands, the United States, Comparative Research
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向安全还是经济倾斜?荷兰和美国国家安全审查机制比较研究
荷兰和美国是坚定的盟友,两国坚定地致力于民主准则和市场原则,这为更加开放、公平和以市场为主导的全球经济奠定了基础。两国的繁荣建立在自由贸易和投资的基础之上。然而,随着近年来全球地缘经济和地缘政治的不断发展,两国都引入或加强了国家安全审查机制。鉴于两国的共同属性,本文对两国的审查机制进行了比较,并探讨了荷兰新的国家安全审查制度是照搬美国的制度,还是引入了独特的创新。文章还探讨了两国在经济与安全平衡方面的不同偏好背后的原因。 外国直接投资、国家安全、经济安全、投资筛选、荷兰、美国、比较研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Loyalty Shares and Loyalty Voting Article: Report on Elverding Conference 2023 on Enhancing Sustainable Business and Corporate Regulation in the EU The CSDD, Oversight Liability and Risk Management Systems The Potential Impact of the CSRD and Other Sustainability Legislation on Listed Companies Tilted Balance to Security or Economy? A Comparative Study of National Security Review Mechanisms in the Netherlands and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1