Ancien Regime Jurisprudence Shaped by a Primordial Jewish-Christian Polemic

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Review of Rabbinic Judaism Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1163/15700704-20240002
Shael Herman
{"title":"Ancien Regime Jurisprudence Shaped by a Primordial Jewish-Christian Polemic","authors":"Shael Herman","doi":"10.1163/15700704-20240002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the eighteenth century, Jewish-Christian polemics fueled a legal dualism among French officials, Jewish communities, and Christian Hebraists. Out of this friction emerged the <jats:italic>Recueil des Loix, Coutumes, et Usages Observes par les Juifs de Metz</jats:italic>, which illuminated Jewish laws for French judges unschooled in Hebrew and the regional Judeo-Allemande dialect. Metz officials’ request for the <jats:italic>Recueil</jats:italic> cheered Jewish leaders who hoped to enhance Christian interest in the community’s internal life, even as skeptical Metz Jews likely suspected intensified surveillance of their transactions both among themselves and with Christians. Still, in interpreting Jewish law, <jats:italic>ancien regime</jats:italic> courts did not uniformly promote antisemitism. On the contrary, as seen in the compilation of the <jats:italic>Recueil</jats:italic>, judges often explored Jewish law with genuine curiosity and sought to reconcile it with Christian ideals, even if some judges clung to a hope of converting Jews, for which purpose Jewish law needed to be understood.","PeriodicalId":40689,"journal":{"name":"Review of Rabbinic Judaism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Rabbinic Judaism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-20240002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the eighteenth century, Jewish-Christian polemics fueled a legal dualism among French officials, Jewish communities, and Christian Hebraists. Out of this friction emerged the Recueil des Loix, Coutumes, et Usages Observes par les Juifs de Metz, which illuminated Jewish laws for French judges unschooled in Hebrew and the regional Judeo-Allemande dialect. Metz officials’ request for the Recueil cheered Jewish leaders who hoped to enhance Christian interest in the community’s internal life, even as skeptical Metz Jews likely suspected intensified surveillance of their transactions both among themselves and with Christians. Still, in interpreting Jewish law, ancien regime courts did not uniformly promote antisemitism. On the contrary, as seen in the compilation of the Recueil, judges often explored Jewish law with genuine curiosity and sought to reconcile it with Christian ideals, even if some judges clung to a hope of converting Jews, for which purpose Jewish law needed to be understood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原始犹太教与基督教对立所形成的古代法理学
18 世纪,犹太教与基督教的论战助长了法国官员、犹太社区和基督教希伯来人之间的法律二元论。在这种摩擦中产生了《梅斯犹太人法律、习俗和惯例汇编》,它为不懂希伯来语和犹太-阿尔勒曼德地区方言的法国法官阐明了犹太法律。梅斯官员对《汇编》的要求让希望提高基督徒对社区内部生活兴趣的犹太领袖们欢欣鼓舞,尽管持怀疑态度的梅斯犹太人可能怀疑他们之间以及与基督徒之间的交易受到了更严密的监视。尽管如此,在解释犹太法时,前政权的法院并没有一味宣扬反犹太主义。相反,从《汇编》的编纂中可以看出,法官们经常怀着真正的好奇心探索犹太法,并试图将其与基督教的理想相协调,即使有些法官还抱有让犹太人皈依的希望,而这正是理解犹太法的目的所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Marriage Ceremony in Early Medieval Ashkenaz “And He Gives Her a Bill of Divorcement” Polemics on Perfection: Maimonides’ Last Law on Slaves Resolves the Debate The Rabbinical Coalition of Libyan Jewry under the Leadership of Rabbi Eliyahu Bekhor Ḥazzan A Memorial Day for the Books Annihilated in the Holocaust: History and Reason
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1