Knowledge and attitudes toward anaphylaxis to local anesthetics in dental practice

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1038/s41405-024-00210-x
Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Juan C. Gallardo-Bastidas, Gabriela Rouillon Borrero, Hans Mautong, Paola Andrea Mena Silva, Zouina Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Leonardo Cano, Karla Robles-Velasco
{"title":"Knowledge and attitudes toward anaphylaxis to local anesthetics in dental practice","authors":"Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Juan C. Gallardo-Bastidas, Gabriela Rouillon Borrero, Hans Mautong, Paola Andrea Mena Silva, Zouina Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Leonardo Cano, Karla Robles-Velasco","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00210-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective/aim</h3><p>The absence of a comprehensive understanding of potential anaphylactic reactions to local anesthetics (LAs) and management can result in grave consequences. For this reason we aim to assess Latin American dentists’ knowledge, preparedness, and competency in managing anaphylactic reactions to LAs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and Methods</h3><p><b>Design:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to February 2022. Board-certified dentists answered a survey comprising 26 structured questions. Chi-square tests and logistic regression models were performed in Stata 17.0. <b>Setting:</b> Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, and other Latin American countries.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of 507 respondents, lidocaine was the most frequently used LA (88.1%). While 85.2% could identify dyspnea as a symptom of anaphylaxis, only 50.1% knew the correct route for epinephrine administration, and just 43.5% had epinephrine in their emergency kits. Confidence in managing anaphylactic reactions was low (9.6%). Older age was inversely related to both knowledge of anaphylaxis management and the possession of epinephrine (<i>P</i> = 0.003 and <i>P</i> = 0.0001, respectively).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Discussion</h3><p>Our study highlights a concerning discrepancy between the practical readiness of Latin American dentists in handling anaphylaxis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The study’s findings underscore the need for educational interventions to improve the readiness to identify and handle anaphylactic emergencies in dental practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00210-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/aim

The absence of a comprehensive understanding of potential anaphylactic reactions to local anesthetics (LAs) and management can result in grave consequences. For this reason we aim to assess Latin American dentists’ knowledge, preparedness, and competency in managing anaphylactic reactions to LAs.

Materials and Methods

Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to February 2022. Board-certified dentists answered a survey comprising 26 structured questions. Chi-square tests and logistic regression models were performed in Stata 17.0. Setting: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, and other Latin American countries.

Results

Of 507 respondents, lidocaine was the most frequently used LA (88.1%). While 85.2% could identify dyspnea as a symptom of anaphylaxis, only 50.1% knew the correct route for epinephrine administration, and just 43.5% had epinephrine in their emergency kits. Confidence in managing anaphylactic reactions was low (9.6%). Older age was inversely related to both knowledge of anaphylaxis management and the possession of epinephrine (P = 0.003 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

Discussion

Our study highlights a concerning discrepancy between the practical readiness of Latin American dentists in handling anaphylaxis.

Conclusion

The study’s findings underscore the need for educational interventions to improve the readiness to identify and handle anaphylactic emergencies in dental practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科医生对局部麻醉剂过敏性休克的认识和态度
目的/意义如果对局部麻醉剂(LAs)可能引起的过敏反应及处理缺乏全面了解,可能会导致严重后果。因此,我们旨在评估拉丁美洲牙医在处理局麻药过敏反应方面的知识、准备情况和能力:我们于 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 2 月开展了一项横断面研究。通过认证的牙科医生回答了由 26 个结构化问题组成的调查问卷。在 Stata 17.0 中进行了卡方检验和逻辑回归模型。研究地点结果 在 507 位受访者中,利多卡因是最常用的 LA(88.1%)。虽然 85.2% 的受访者能将呼吸困难确定为过敏性休克的症状,但只有 50.1% 的受访者知道肾上腺素的正确给药途径,只有 43.5% 的受访者的应急包中有肾上腺素。对处理过敏性反应的信心不足(9.6%)。年龄与过敏性休克处理知识和肾上腺素的拥有量成反比(分别为 P = 0.003 和 P = 0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of two different self-disinfection alginate impression material. Dental team barriers and enablers for the dental management of adults with severe obesity: a qualitative analysis. Mechanism of curcumin in the prevention and treatment of oral submucosal fibrosis and progress in clinical application research. Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity characteristics of experimental epoxy -based endodontic sealer loaded with silver gold nanoparticles: in vitro study. Beyond the Bite: Exploring Mental Health of Dental Faculty in Pakistan- a multi-institutional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1