Integrating hands-on practical and reflective feedback in teaching dental materials science to undergraduate dental students

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1111/eje.13011
Galvin Sim Siang Lin, Chan Choong Foong
{"title":"Integrating hands-on practical and reflective feedback in teaching dental materials science to undergraduate dental students","authors":"Galvin Sim Siang Lin,&nbsp;Chan Choong Foong","doi":"10.1111/eje.13011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to develop a module that incorporates hands-on and reflective feedback in teaching dental materials science and subsequently analyse undergraduate dental students' learning experiences with the module.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The module was developed based on the ADDIE (Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) model. First, a need analysis was conducted, followed by designing the module to address the needs. Next, the module sought experts' feedback and was piloted. The revised module was implemented among all second-year undergraduate dental students. Finally, a validated questionnaire (5-point Likert scale items and open-ended questions) was used to evaluate students' learning experiences. The questionnaire Likert scale items were analysed descriptively, whereas open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the analysis phase, a slight misalignment in cognitive competency levels was observed, alongside a need for the inclusion of more hands-on activities. In the design phase, learning objectives and resources were listed. Subsequently, a module consisting of four teaching sessions (3 h each) was developed, and the pilot test showed favourable feedback. The module was then implemented in small groups of 10–12 students. In the evaluation phase, 72 students (97% response rate) completed the questionnaire. The majority of students agreed with all items, with mean scores ranging from 4.53 to 4.72. Open-ended responses highlighted that hands-on activities and reflective feedback sessions were useful.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Students demonstrated positive learning experiences after participating in the module, advocating for dental educators to consider more hands-on activities and reflective feedback sessions in teaching dental materials science.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 3","pages":"816-824"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.13011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to develop a module that incorporates hands-on and reflective feedback in teaching dental materials science and subsequently analyse undergraduate dental students' learning experiences with the module.

Materials and Methods

The module was developed based on the ADDIE (Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) model. First, a need analysis was conducted, followed by designing the module to address the needs. Next, the module sought experts' feedback and was piloted. The revised module was implemented among all second-year undergraduate dental students. Finally, a validated questionnaire (5-point Likert scale items and open-ended questions) was used to evaluate students' learning experiences. The questionnaire Likert scale items were analysed descriptively, whereas open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis.

Results

In the analysis phase, a slight misalignment in cognitive competency levels was observed, alongside a need for the inclusion of more hands-on activities. In the design phase, learning objectives and resources were listed. Subsequently, a module consisting of four teaching sessions (3 h each) was developed, and the pilot test showed favourable feedback. The module was then implemented in small groups of 10–12 students. In the evaluation phase, 72 students (97% response rate) completed the questionnaire. The majority of students agreed with all items, with mean scores ranging from 4.53 to 4.72. Open-ended responses highlighted that hands-on activities and reflective feedback sessions were useful.

Conclusion

Students demonstrated positive learning experiences after participating in the module, advocating for dental educators to consider more hands-on activities and reflective feedback sessions in teaching dental materials science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将动手实践和反思反馈整合到牙科材料科学本科生的教学中
材料与方法该模块是根据ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实施、评估)模型开发的。首先进行需求分析,然后设计模块以满足需求。接下来,该模块征求了专家的反馈意见,并进行了试点。修订后的模块在所有口腔医学本科二年级学生中实施。最后,使用经过验证的调查问卷(5 点李克特量表项目和开放式问题)来评估学生的学习体验。对问卷中的李克特量表项目进行了描述性分析,而对开放式问题的回答则采用了内容分析法。在设计阶段,列出了学习目标和资源。随后,开发了一个由四节教学课(每节课 3 小时)组成的模块,试点测试表明反馈良好。该模块随后在 10-12 名学生的小组中实施。在评估阶段,72 名学生(97% 的回复率)完成了问卷调查。大多数学生同意所有项目,平均得分在 4.53 至 4.72 之间。结论学生在参与该模块后表现出了积极的学习体验,倡导口腔教育工作者在口腔材料科学教学中考虑更多的实践活动和反思反馈环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Graduating European Dentist Curriculum Framework: A 7-Year Review. Beyond the Drill: Understanding Empathy Among Undergraduate Dental Students. Future-Proofing Dentistry: A Qualitative Exploration of COVID-19 Responses in UK Dental Schools. Mapping the Landscape of Generative Language Models in Dental Education: A Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Bard. Performance of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer in Generating Scientific Abstracts in Dentistry: A Comparative Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1