Old by obsolescence: The paradox of aging in the digital era

IF 1.7 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1111/bioe.13288
Joan Llorca Albareda, Pablo García-Barranquero
{"title":"Old by obsolescence: The paradox of aging in the digital era","authors":"Joan Llorca Albareda,&nbsp;Pablo García-Barranquero","doi":"10.1111/bioe.13288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Geroscience and philosophy of aging have tended to focus their analyses on the biological and chronological dimensions of aging. Namely, one ages with the passage of time and by experiencing the cellular-molecular deterioration that accompanies this process. However, our concept of aging depends decisively on the social valuations held about it. In this article, we will argue that, if we study social aging in the contemporary world, a novel phenomenon can be identified: the paradox of aging in the digital era. If the social understanding of aging today is linked to unproductivity and obsolescence; then there is a possibility that, given the pace of change of digital technologies, we become obsolete at an early chronological and biological age, and therefore, feel old at a younger age. First, we will present the social dimension of aging based on Rowe and Kahn's model of successful aging. We will also show that their notion of social aging hardly considers structural aspects and weakens their approach. Second, departing from social aging in its structural sense, we will develop the paradox of aging in the digital era. On the one hand, we will explain how the institutionalization of aging has occurred in modern societies and how it is anchored in the concepts of obsolescence and productivity. On the other hand, we will state the kind of obsolescence that digitalization produces and argue that it can make cohorts of biologically and chronologically young individuals obsolete, and thus they would be personally and socially perceived as old.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":"38 9","pages":"755-762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bioe.13288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.13288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geroscience and philosophy of aging have tended to focus their analyses on the biological and chronological dimensions of aging. Namely, one ages with the passage of time and by experiencing the cellular-molecular deterioration that accompanies this process. However, our concept of aging depends decisively on the social valuations held about it. In this article, we will argue that, if we study social aging in the contemporary world, a novel phenomenon can be identified: the paradox of aging in the digital era. If the social understanding of aging today is linked to unproductivity and obsolescence; then there is a possibility that, given the pace of change of digital technologies, we become obsolete at an early chronological and biological age, and therefore, feel old at a younger age. First, we will present the social dimension of aging based on Rowe and Kahn's model of successful aging. We will also show that their notion of social aging hardly considers structural aspects and weakens their approach. Second, departing from social aging in its structural sense, we will develop the paradox of aging in the digital era. On the one hand, we will explain how the institutionalization of aging has occurred in modern societies and how it is anchored in the concepts of obsolescence and productivity. On the other hand, we will state the kind of obsolescence that digitalization produces and argue that it can make cohorts of biologically and chronologically young individuals obsolete, and thus they would be personally and socially perceived as old.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因过时而老去:数字时代的老龄化悖论
老年科学和衰老哲学往往把分析重点放在衰老的生物和时间方面。也就是说,人的衰老是随着时间的流逝和伴随这一过程的细胞-分子衰退而发生的。然而,我们对衰老的概念在很大程度上取决于社会对衰老的评价。在本文中,我们将论证,如果我们研究当代世界的社会老龄化,就会发现一个新的现象:数字时代的老龄化悖论。如果当今社会对老龄化的理解是与非生产性和过时联系在一起的,那么,考虑到数字技术的变化速度,我们有可能在较早的年龄和生理年龄就过时了,因此,在较年轻的时候就感觉自己老了。首先,我们将以罗和卡恩的成功老龄化模型为基础,介绍老龄化的社会维度。我们还将说明,他们的社会老龄化概念几乎没有考虑结构方面,削弱了他们的方法。其次,从结构意义上的社会老龄化出发,我们将提出数字时代的老龄化悖论。一方面,我们将解释老龄化是如何在现代社会中制度化的,以及它是如何植根于过时和生产力的概念中的。另一方面,我们将说明数字化所产生的过时类型,并认为数字化会使一批在生物学和时间学上年轻的人变得过时,从而使他们在个人和社会上被视为老人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
期刊最新文献
Cracking the code of the slow code: A taxonomy of slow code practices and their clinical and ethical implications. Moral enhancement and cheapened achievement: Psychedelics, virtual reality and AI. Misaligned hope and conviction in health care. Contraceptive digital pills and sexual and reproductive healthcare of women with mental disabilities: Problem or solution? Ethical considerations for non-procreative uterus transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1