Choosing not to help: The ethical challenge of beneficence for clinicians conducting ethnographic research

Samuel Brookfield
{"title":"Choosing not to help: The ethical challenge of beneficence for clinicians conducting ethnographic research","authors":"Samuel Brookfield","doi":"10.1177/14661381241237407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For clinicians conducting ethnographic research, conflict can arise between the clinical understanding of beneficence, meaning to apply skills and knowledge for people towards whom there is a duty of care, and enacting beneficence through research, which can sometimes allow researchers to withhold assistance in the interests of generating data which may have a broader beneficent effect when applied. As a nurse and ethnographic researcher, I present three reflections on my own fieldwork with people engaging in recovery from harmful methamphetamine use, to explore how beneficence can be enacted in constrained and complex circumstances. These reflections provide the basis for a discussion of how relational ethics can reveal the fabric of microethical actions and decisions which comprise clinical and research interactions, allowing practitioners to demonstrate a continuity between how they enact principles like beneficence both in the context of clinical work and in the field.","PeriodicalId":507430,"journal":{"name":"Ethnography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381241237407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For clinicians conducting ethnographic research, conflict can arise between the clinical understanding of beneficence, meaning to apply skills and knowledge for people towards whom there is a duty of care, and enacting beneficence through research, which can sometimes allow researchers to withhold assistance in the interests of generating data which may have a broader beneficent effect when applied. As a nurse and ethnographic researcher, I present three reflections on my own fieldwork with people engaging in recovery from harmful methamphetamine use, to explore how beneficence can be enacted in constrained and complex circumstances. These reflections provide the basis for a discussion of how relational ethics can reveal the fabric of microethical actions and decisions which comprise clinical and research interactions, allowing practitioners to demonstrate a continuity between how they enact principles like beneficence both in the context of clinical work and in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择不帮助:开展人种学研究的临床医生面临的恩惠伦理挑战
对于开展人种学研究的临床医生来说,临床上对 "恩惠 "的理解(即为有责任照顾的人应用技能和知识)与通过研究实现 "恩惠 "之间可能会产生冲突,因为临床上的恩惠有时会允许研究人员为了生成数据而拒绝提供援助,而这些数据在应用时可能会产生更广泛的恩惠效果。作为一名护士和人种学研究者,我就自己对甲基苯丙胺吸食危害康复者的实地调查提出了三点思考,以探讨如何在受限和复杂的情况下实施惠益。这些思考为讨论关系伦理学如何揭示构成临床和研究互动的微观伦理行动和决策的结构提供了基础,使从业人员能够展示他们如何在临床工作和实地工作中贯彻惠益等原则的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The conviction of the inevitable: Collapsism and collective action in contemporary rural France New forms of home blindness: Rethinking fieldwork methods in digitalized environments America materialis: Things and meaning in a donation warehouse Security and heritage in the making of urban futures: A new research avenue Resisting the future: Preparedness, degradation, and “inquietude” among survivalists in contemporary France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1