Navigating the labyrinth of social exclusion: a bibliometric review

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK Mental Health and Social Inclusion Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1108/mhsi-02-2024-0025
Farsha Farahana Ahmad Izhan, Aidi Ahmi, Nor Azairiah Fatimah Othman, Muhammad Majid
{"title":"Navigating the labyrinth of social exclusion: a bibliometric review","authors":"Farsha Farahana Ahmad Izhan, Aidi Ahmi, Nor Azairiah Fatimah Othman, Muhammad Majid","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-02-2024-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of social exclusion research, examining its evolution and identifying emerging trends and influential contributions in the field.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing bibliometric and thematic analysis of 3,041 Scopus database documents, the study uses tools like VOSviewer for network analysis and Biblioshiny for trend analysis, focusing on publication patterns, author contributions and thematic clusters.\n\nFindings\nThe findings reveal significant growth in social exclusion research since 1979, highlighting key contributions from diverse academic fields. Notable trends include the rise of digital exclusion and environmental justice themes. The study identifies leading authors, institutions and countries contributing to this field, along with highly cited documents that have shaped the discourse on social exclusion.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study acknowledges its reliance on Scopus data and suggests incorporating other databases for future research. It highlights the need to explore emerging topics and address literature gaps.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper presents a unique bibliometric perspective on social exclusion research, underscoring its interdisciplinary nature and evolving focus. The study’s comprehensive approach offers valuable insights into the field’s trajectory, contributing to a deeper understanding of social exclusion phenomena.\n","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-02-2024-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of social exclusion research, examining its evolution and identifying emerging trends and influential contributions in the field. Design/methodology/approach Using bibliometric and thematic analysis of 3,041 Scopus database documents, the study uses tools like VOSviewer for network analysis and Biblioshiny for trend analysis, focusing on publication patterns, author contributions and thematic clusters. Findings The findings reveal significant growth in social exclusion research since 1979, highlighting key contributions from diverse academic fields. Notable trends include the rise of digital exclusion and environmental justice themes. The study identifies leading authors, institutions and countries contributing to this field, along with highly cited documents that have shaped the discourse on social exclusion. Research limitations/implications The study acknowledges its reliance on Scopus data and suggests incorporating other databases for future research. It highlights the need to explore emerging topics and address literature gaps. Originality/value This paper presents a unique bibliometric perspective on social exclusion research, underscoring its interdisciplinary nature and evolving focus. The study’s comprehensive approach offers valuable insights into the field’s trajectory, contributing to a deeper understanding of social exclusion phenomena.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穿越社会排斥的迷宫:文献计量学回顾
目的本研究旨在对社会排斥研究进行全面的文献计量分析,研究其演变过程,并确定该领域的新兴趋势和有影响力的贡献。研究使用 VOSviewer 等工具进行网络分析,使用 Biblioshiny 等工具进行趋势分析,重点关注出版模式、作者贡献和主题集群。值得注意的趋势包括数字排斥和环境正义主题的兴起。该研究确定了在这一领域做出贡献的主要作者、机构和国家,以及影响社会排斥讨论的高被引文献。研究局限性/影响该研究承认其对 Scopus 数据的依赖性,并建议在未来的研究中纳入其他数据库。本文以独特的文献计量学视角审视社会排斥研究,强调了社会排斥研究的跨学科性质和不断变化的研究重点。研究采用的综合方法为了解该领域的发展轨迹提供了宝贵的见解,有助于加深对社会排斥现象的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Student perceptions of post-pandemic university learning: challenges and benefits Student perceptions of post-pandemic university learning: challenges and benefits Mental health and positive introversion: a positive autoethnographic case study of Mark Weeks Mental health and positive introversion: a positive autoethnographic case study of Mark Weeks “The urge to tell and its consequences”: women’s memoirs of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1