An Insight into Knowledge, Perspective, and Practices of Indian Optometrists towards Childhood Myopia

Vision Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.3390/vision8020022
Archana Naik, Siddharth K. Karthikeyan, Jivitha Jyothi Ramesh, Shwetha Bhaskar, C. A. Ganapathi, Sayantani Biswas
{"title":"An Insight into Knowledge, Perspective, and Practices of Indian Optometrists towards Childhood Myopia","authors":"Archana Naik, Siddharth K. Karthikeyan, Jivitha Jyothi Ramesh, Shwetha Bhaskar, C. A. Ganapathi, Sayantani Biswas","doi":"10.3390/vision8020022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current understanding of clinical approaches and barriers in managing childhood myopia among Indian optometrists is limited. This research underscores the necessity and relevance of evidence-based practice guidelines by exploring their knowledge, attitude, and practice towards childhood myopia. A self-administered internet-based 26-item survey was circulated online among practicing optometrists in India. The questions assessed the demographics, knowledge, self-reported clinical practice behavior, barriers, source of information guiding their management, and extent of adult caregiver engagement for childhood myopia. Of 393 responses, a significant proportion of respondents (32.6–92.4%) were unaware of the ocular complications associated with high myopia, with less than half (46.5%) routinely performing ocular biometry in clinical practice. Despite the growing awareness of emerging myopia management options, the uptake remains generally poor, with single-vision distance full-correction spectacles (70.3%) being the most common mode of vision correction. Barriers to adopting optimal myopia care are medicolegal concerns, absence of clinical practice guidelines, and inadequate consultation time. Own clinical experience and original research articles were the primary sources of information supporting clinical practice. Most (>70%) respondents considered involving the adult caregiver in their child’s clinical decision-making process. While practitioners’ awareness and activity of newer myopia management strategies are improving, there is plenty of scope for its enhancement. The importance of evidence-based practice guidelines and continuing education on myopia control might help practitioners enhance their clinical decision-making skills.","PeriodicalId":23649,"journal":{"name":"Vision","volume":"358 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8020022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current understanding of clinical approaches and barriers in managing childhood myopia among Indian optometrists is limited. This research underscores the necessity and relevance of evidence-based practice guidelines by exploring their knowledge, attitude, and practice towards childhood myopia. A self-administered internet-based 26-item survey was circulated online among practicing optometrists in India. The questions assessed the demographics, knowledge, self-reported clinical practice behavior, barriers, source of information guiding their management, and extent of adult caregiver engagement for childhood myopia. Of 393 responses, a significant proportion of respondents (32.6–92.4%) were unaware of the ocular complications associated with high myopia, with less than half (46.5%) routinely performing ocular biometry in clinical practice. Despite the growing awareness of emerging myopia management options, the uptake remains generally poor, with single-vision distance full-correction spectacles (70.3%) being the most common mode of vision correction. Barriers to adopting optimal myopia care are medicolegal concerns, absence of clinical practice guidelines, and inadequate consultation time. Own clinical experience and original research articles were the primary sources of information supporting clinical practice. Most (>70%) respondents considered involving the adult caregiver in their child’s clinical decision-making process. While practitioners’ awareness and activity of newer myopia management strategies are improving, there is plenty of scope for its enhancement. The importance of evidence-based practice guidelines and continuing education on myopia control might help practitioners enhance their clinical decision-making skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洞察印度验光师对儿童近视的认识、观点和做法
目前,印度验光师对管理儿童近视的临床方法和障碍了解有限。本研究通过探讨印度验光师对儿童近视的认识、态度和实践,强调了循证实践指南的必要性和相关性。在印度的执业验光师中进行了一项基于互联网的 26 个项目的自填式在线调查。这些问题评估了人口统计学、知识、自我报告的临床实践行为、障碍、指导其管理的信息来源以及成年护理人员参与儿童近视治疗的程度。在 393 份答卷中,很大一部分受访者(32.6%-92.4%)不知道高度近视会引起眼部并发症,只有不到一半的受访者(46.5%)在临床实践中例行进行眼部生物测量。尽管人们对新出现的近视治疗方案的认识不断提高,但接受率仍然普遍较低,最常见的视力矫正方式是配戴单焦远视全矫正眼镜(70.3%)。采用最佳近视治疗方法的障碍在于医疗法律问题、缺乏临床实践指南以及咨询时间不足。个人临床经验和原创研究文章是支持临床实践的主要信息来源。大多数受访者(>70%)认为,在孩子的临床决策过程中,应让成年看护人参与其中。虽然从业人员对新的近视管理策略的认识和积极性正在提高,但仍有很大的提升空间。循证实践指南和近视控制继续教育的重要性可能有助于从业人员提高临床决策技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Eye Axial Length Measurements Taken Using Partial Coherence Interferometry and OCT Biometry The Effect of the Zonular Fiber Angle of Insertion on Accommodation Perceptual Biases in the Interpretation of Non-Rigid Shape Transformations from Motion A New Model of a Macular Buckle and a Refined Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Myopic Traction Maculopathy Eyes on Memory: Pupillometry in Encoding and Retrieval
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1