Short-term effect of no-tillage management on the chemical attributes and bacterial diversity in soils in an organic production system

Gustavo Souza Lima Sant'Anna , Bruna Caroline Franzan , Dérique Biassi , Carlos Magno dos Santos , Maura Santos Reis de Andrade da Silva , Nivaldo Schultz , Everaldo Zonta , Irene da Silva Coelho
{"title":"Short-term effect of no-tillage management on the chemical attributes and bacterial diversity in soils in an organic production system","authors":"Gustavo Souza Lima Sant'Anna ,&nbsp;Bruna Caroline Franzan ,&nbsp;Dérique Biassi ,&nbsp;Carlos Magno dos Santos ,&nbsp;Maura Santos Reis de Andrade da Silva ,&nbsp;Nivaldo Schultz ,&nbsp;Everaldo Zonta ,&nbsp;Irene da Silva Coelho","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>No-tillage (NT) has been adopted in organic agriculture as an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for improving soil conservation. Cover crops (CC) play a vital role in this process by providing straw and releasing nutrients into the soil. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of NT and CT management on the chemical properties and bacterial diversity of soil following the cultivation of diverse CC in an organic system. The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with subdivided plots, wherein the plots represented CT and NT, and the subplots represented the diverse CC tested, including pearl millet, sunn hemp, jack bean, seed mixes 1 and 2 (containing 100 % and 50 % of the recommended seeding rates for each crop), and spontaneous plants. The evaluations were conducted one year after the experiment was conducted. The results demonstrated that NT promoted increases in soil magnesium, phosphorus, and organic carbon contents, including increased bacterial richness. Moreover, NT resulted in a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes, GAL15, and Myxococcota. Conversely, CT favored a greater relative abundance of Actinobacteria, in addition to the members of Bacteroidetes. Regarding the influence of CC, no significant differences were observed in the diversity and structure of the bacterial communities, except for subgroup 17, which was more abundant in spontaneously grown plants. NT proved to be more effective than CT in improving soil chemical properties and bacterial diversity, implying its potential to contribute to sustainable agricultural systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000170/pdfft?md5=2271858b99bc9f0b3c4c1e516787dc3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000170-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No-tillage (NT) has been adopted in organic agriculture as an alternative to conventional tillage (CT) for improving soil conservation. Cover crops (CC) play a vital role in this process by providing straw and releasing nutrients into the soil. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of NT and CT management on the chemical properties and bacterial diversity of soil following the cultivation of diverse CC in an organic system. The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with subdivided plots, wherein the plots represented CT and NT, and the subplots represented the diverse CC tested, including pearl millet, sunn hemp, jack bean, seed mixes 1 and 2 (containing 100 % and 50 % of the recommended seeding rates for each crop), and spontaneous plants. The evaluations were conducted one year after the experiment was conducted. The results demonstrated that NT promoted increases in soil magnesium, phosphorus, and organic carbon contents, including increased bacterial richness. Moreover, NT resulted in a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes, GAL15, and Myxococcota. Conversely, CT favored a greater relative abundance of Actinobacteria, in addition to the members of Bacteroidetes. Regarding the influence of CC, no significant differences were observed in the diversity and structure of the bacterial communities, except for subgroup 17, which was more abundant in spontaneously grown plants. NT proved to be more effective than CT in improving soil chemical properties and bacterial diversity, implying its potential to contribute to sustainable agricultural systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免耕管理对有机生产系统土壤化学属性和细菌多样性的短期影响
有机农业采用免耕法(NT)替代传统耕作法(CT),以改善土壤保持状况。在这一过程中,覆盖作物(CC)通过提供秸秆和向土壤释放养分发挥了重要作用。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估在有机系统中种植多种 CC 后,NT 和 CT 管理对土壤化学特性和细菌多样性的影响。实验采用随机区组设计,并划分了若干小区,其中小区代表 CT 和 NT,小区代表所测试的多种 CC,包括珍珠黍、苘麻、胡豆、混合种子 1 和 2(每种作物的建议播种量分别为 100% 和 50%)以及自生植物。实验一年后进行了评估。结果表明,NT 促进了土壤中镁、磷和有机碳含量的增加,包括细菌丰富度的增加。此外,NT 增加了类杆菌、GAL15 和 Myxococcota 的数量。相反,除了类杆菌科细菌外,CT 有利于提高放线菌的相对丰度。至于 CC 的影响,除了亚群 17 在自发生长的植物中含量较高外,在细菌群落的多样性和结构方面没有观察到明显差异。事实证明,在改善土壤化学性质和细菌多样性方面,NT 比 CT 更有效,这意味着它有潜力为可持续农业系统做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal pollution in farmland soils surrounding mining areas in China and the response of soil microbial communities Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains Medium-term economic impacts of cover crop adoption in Maryland Using MIR and XRF spectroscopy to develop a heavy metal leaching potential model in Irish top soils Erratum regarding missing Conflict of Interest (COI) Statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1