Now or Later? Examining Social and Financial Decision-Making in Middle-to-Older Aged Adults

Amy Halpin, Morgan Tallman, Angelica Boeve, Rebecca K MacAulay
{"title":"Now or Later? Examining Social and Financial Decision-Making in Middle-to-Older Aged Adults","authors":"Amy Halpin, Morgan Tallman, Angelica Boeve, Rebecca K MacAulay","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Contextually driven decision-making is multidimensional, as individuals need to contend with prioritizing both competing and complementary demands. However, data is limited as to whether temporal discounting rates vary as a function of framing (gains vs. loss) and domain (monetary vs. social) in middle-to-older aged adults. It is also unclear whether socioaffective characteristics like social isolation and loneliness are associated with temporal discounting. Method Temporal discounting rates were examined across monetary gain, monetary loss, social gain, and social loss conditions in 140 adults aged 50-90 during the Omicron stage of the pandemic. Self-report measures assessed loneliness and social isolation levels. Results Results found evidence of steeper temporal discounting rates for gains as compared to losses in both domains. Social outcomes were also more steeply discounted than monetary outcomes, without evidence of an interaction with the framing condition. Socioeconomic and socioaffective factors were unexpectedly not associated with temporal discounting rates. Discussion Community-dwelling middle-to-older aged adults showed a preference for immediate rewards and devalued social outcomes more than monetary outcomes. These findings have implications for tailoring social and financial incentive programs for middle to later adulthood.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Contextually driven decision-making is multidimensional, as individuals need to contend with prioritizing both competing and complementary demands. However, data is limited as to whether temporal discounting rates vary as a function of framing (gains vs. loss) and domain (monetary vs. social) in middle-to-older aged adults. It is also unclear whether socioaffective characteristics like social isolation and loneliness are associated with temporal discounting. Method Temporal discounting rates were examined across monetary gain, monetary loss, social gain, and social loss conditions in 140 adults aged 50-90 during the Omicron stage of the pandemic. Self-report measures assessed loneliness and social isolation levels. Results Results found evidence of steeper temporal discounting rates for gains as compared to losses in both domains. Social outcomes were also more steeply discounted than monetary outcomes, without evidence of an interaction with the framing condition. Socioeconomic and socioaffective factors were unexpectedly not associated with temporal discounting rates. Discussion Community-dwelling middle-to-older aged adults showed a preference for immediate rewards and devalued social outcomes more than monetary outcomes. These findings have implications for tailoring social and financial incentive programs for middle to later adulthood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现在还是以后?研究中老年人的社会和财务决策
目标 情境驱动决策是多维的,因为个体需要优先考虑相互竞争和互补的需求。然而,中老年人的时间贴现率是否会因框架(收益与损失)和领域(货币与社会)的不同而变化,这方面的数据还很有限。此外,社会隔离和孤独感等社会情感特征是否与时间折扣相关也不清楚。方法 在大流行的 Omicron 阶段,对 140 名年龄在 50-90 岁的成年人进行了货币收益、货币损失、社会收益和社会损失条件下的时间贴现率研究。自我报告测量评估了孤独感和社会隔离程度。结果 结果发现,在这两个领域中,收益的时间折现率比损失的时间折现率更高。社会结果的时间折现率也比金钱结果的时间折现率高,但没有证据表明两者之间存在相互作用。出乎意料的是,社会经济和社会情感因素与时间折扣率无关。讨论 居住在社区的中老年人表现出对即时奖励的偏好,对社会结果的贬值程度高于对金钱结果的贬值程度。这些发现对于为中老年人量身定制社会和经济激励项目具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporary Setback or Lasting Challenge? The Impact of Transient and Persistent Functional disability on later life well-being Context Matters: Internet Usage and Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worrying Across the Generations: The Impact of Adult Grandchildren’s Problems on Grandparents’ Well-Being The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood Improving Memory through Better Sleep in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Tai Chi Intervention Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1