A Framework for Determining Research Topics and Problems in Mixed Methods Studies: A Call for Transparency

IF 3.8 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Mixed Methods Research Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1177/15586898241251506
Nancy L. Leech, David J. Leech
{"title":"A Framework for Determining Research Topics and Problems in Mixed Methods Studies: A Call for Transparency","authors":"Nancy L. Leech, David J. Leech","doi":"10.1177/15586898241251506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the essential yet often overlooked aspect of choosing a research topic in mixed methods research studies. Seven leading mixed methods textbooks are reviewed for insights into choosing a research topic which elucidates the dearth of specific guidance in the existing literature. Utilizing the established 13-step framework proposed by Collins et al. (2006), a new step is proposed that incorporates the process of research topic selection. This addition is intended to encourage thoughtful consideration of the research topic and make transparent decisions regarding topic selection, thereby ensuring coherence with the broader mixed methods research process. The framework is presented alongside an exploration of reasons for choosing a research topic and problem and is derived from the reviewed literature.","PeriodicalId":47844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241251506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the essential yet often overlooked aspect of choosing a research topic in mixed methods research studies. Seven leading mixed methods textbooks are reviewed for insights into choosing a research topic which elucidates the dearth of specific guidance in the existing literature. Utilizing the established 13-step framework proposed by Collins et al. (2006), a new step is proposed that incorporates the process of research topic selection. This addition is intended to encourage thoughtful consideration of the research topic and make transparent decisions regarding topic selection, thereby ensuring coherence with the broader mixed methods research process. The framework is presented alongside an exploration of reasons for choosing a research topic and problem and is derived from the reviewed literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在混合方法研究中确定研究课题和问题的框架:呼吁提高透明度
本文探讨了在混合方法研究中选择研究课题这一至关重要但又经常被忽视的问题。文章回顾了七本主要的混合方法教科书,深入探讨了如何选择研究课题,阐明了现有文献中缺乏具体指导的问题。利用柯林斯等人(2006 年)提出的既定 13 步框架,我们提出了一个新的步骤,其中包含了研究课题的选择过程。增加这一步骤的目的是鼓励对研究课题进行深思熟虑,并在选题方面做出透明的决定,从而确保与更广泛的混合方法研究过程保持一致。在介绍该框架的同时,还探讨了选择研究课题和问题的原因,该框架源于所查阅的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
28.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mixed Methods Research serves as a premiere outlet for ground-breaking and seminal work in the field of mixed methods research. Of primary importance will be building an international and multidisciplinary community of mixed methods researchers. The journal''s scope includes exploring a global terminology and nomenclature for mixed methods research, delineating where mixed methods research may be used most effectively, creating the paradigmatic and philosophical foundations for mixed methods research, illuminating design and procedure issues, and determining the logistics of conducting mixed methods research. JMMR invites articles from a wide variety of international perspectives, including academics and practitioners from psychology, sociology, education, evaluation, health sciences, geography, communication, management, family studies, marketing, social work, and other related disciplines across the social, behavioral, and human sciences.
期刊最新文献
Multi-Resolution Design: Using Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses to Recursively Zoom in and out of the Same Dataset In This Issue: Artificial Intelligence, Bridging Methodological Divides Through Mixed Methods, Literature Reviews, Integration of Structural Equation Modeling and Autoethnography, and Research Problems in Mixed Methods Media Review: The Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods Research Design In This Issue: Special Issue Dedicated to Michael D. Fetters Toward a Framework for Appraising the Quality of Integration in Mixed Methods Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1