Aripiprazole for treating delirium: A systematic review—Is it a valid yet understudied treatment?

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1177/02698811241249648
Stefano Maddalena, Carlo Magistri, Cristiano Mellini, Giuseppe Sarli
{"title":"Aripiprazole for treating delirium: A systematic review—Is it a valid yet understudied treatment?","authors":"Stefano Maddalena, Carlo Magistri, Cristiano Mellini, Giuseppe Sarli","doi":"10.1177/02698811241249648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Delirium is a neuropsychiatric condition that commonly occurs in medical settings, especially among older individuals. Despite the lack of strong evidence in the literature, haloperidol is considered the first-line pharmacological intervention. Unfortunately, its adverse effects can be severe, and psychiatrists are considering the use of alternative drugs targeting dopamine and serotonin domains (atypical antipsychotics). Among them, aripiprazole is considered to have one of the safest pharmacological profiles.Aims:The purpose of this study is to examine the studies on aripiprazole as a pharmacological treatment of delirium present in today’s literature.Methods:We carried out systematic research of MedLine, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and ScienceDirect examining articles written between January 2002 and September 2023, including experimental studies published in peer-reviewed journals.Results:The 6 final included studies examined a total of 130 patients, showing a delirium resolution in a 7-day span of 73.8% of patients treated with aripiprazole.Conclusions:Considering the limited data currently available, we can assert that aripiprazole is at least as efficient as haloperidol, the true point is that it has a far better tolerability and safety profile. Nonetheless, further studies are necessary to provide more compelling data, together with a more precise indication regarding minimum efficient dose, as the main limitations of our review are the very small sample size, the small percentage of subjects with preexisting dementia, and the fact that most studies used scales with low specificity for the examined condition.","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241249648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Delirium is a neuropsychiatric condition that commonly occurs in medical settings, especially among older individuals. Despite the lack of strong evidence in the literature, haloperidol is considered the first-line pharmacological intervention. Unfortunately, its adverse effects can be severe, and psychiatrists are considering the use of alternative drugs targeting dopamine and serotonin domains (atypical antipsychotics). Among them, aripiprazole is considered to have one of the safest pharmacological profiles.Aims:The purpose of this study is to examine the studies on aripiprazole as a pharmacological treatment of delirium present in today’s literature.Methods:We carried out systematic research of MedLine, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and ScienceDirect examining articles written between January 2002 and September 2023, including experimental studies published in peer-reviewed journals.Results:The 6 final included studies examined a total of 130 patients, showing a delirium resolution in a 7-day span of 73.8% of patients treated with aripiprazole.Conclusions:Considering the limited data currently available, we can assert that aripiprazole is at least as efficient as haloperidol, the true point is that it has a far better tolerability and safety profile. Nonetheless, further studies are necessary to provide more compelling data, together with a more precise indication regarding minimum efficient dose, as the main limitations of our review are the very small sample size, the small percentage of subjects with preexisting dementia, and the fact that most studies used scales with low specificity for the examined condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿立哌唑治疗谵妄:系统综述--它是一种有效但研究不足的治疗方法吗?
背景:谵妄是一种神经精神疾病,常见于医疗机构,尤其是老年人。尽管缺乏有力的文献证据,氟哌啶醇仍被视为一线药物干预措施。遗憾的是,氟哌啶醇的不良反应可能很严重,因此精神科医生正在考虑使用针对多巴胺和血清素领域的替代药物(非典型抗精神病药)。方法:我们对 MedLine、PubMed、Cochrane、Embase 和 ScienceDirect 进行了系统研究,考察了 2002 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月间撰写的文章,包括发表在同行评审期刊上的实验研究。结论:考虑到目前可用的数据有限,我们可以断言阿立哌唑至少与氟哌啶醇一样有效,但其耐受性和安全性要好得多。尽管如此,我们仍有必要开展进一步的研究,以提供更有说服力的数据,并就最低有效剂量做出更精确的说明,因为我们研究的主要局限性在于样本量非常小,患有原有痴呆症的受试者比例较低,而且大多数研究使用的量表对受试者病情的特异性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
期刊最新文献
High-dose Vitamin-B6 reduces sensory over-responsivity. Clinical effects of CYP2D6 phenoconversion in patients with psychosis. Influence of panic disorder and paroxetine on brain functional hubs in drug-free patients. Aspirin may be more suitable for patients with major depression: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Optimizing the individual dosing of paroxetine in major depressive disorder with therapeutic drug monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1