{"title":"A meta-analysis of the relationship between abnormal pretreatment EEG and epilepsy recurrence","authors":"Juan Yao , Chengrong Liao , Yao Wang , Zheng Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Researchers have studied the risk factors for epilepsy recurrence among patients who withdraw from antiseizure medication (ASM). These studies aimed to determine the optimal time for ASM withdrawal. EEG findings are one of the risk factors that has been studied. However, it remains unclear whether abnormal pretreatment EEG findings are a risk factor for recurrence after ASM withdrawal. We performed this meta-analysis to clarify this issue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrieved literature from the PubMed and Embase databases, and used the Newcastle<img>Ottawa Scale to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyse the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total,710 articles were retrieved from the databases. Ultimately, after screening, 11 articles involving 1686 patients with epilepsy were included. Compared with that for a normal EEG, the odds ratio (OR) for an abnormal EEG was 1.10 (P=0.50), with an I<sup>2</sup> value of 32% (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that the children-to-adolescents subgroup had an OR of 1.21 (P=0.27), and the children-to-adults subgroup had an OR of 0.64 (P=0.14) for an abnormal EEG. A separate subgroup analysis revealed that the focal epilepsy subgroup had an OR of 1.30 (P=0.37), and the generalized epilepsy and focal epilepsy subgroup had an OR of 1.07 (P=0.67) for an abnormal EEG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The risk of epilepsy recurrence is not related to pretreatment EEG findings, regardless of age or epilepsy classification. The associations of pre- and posttreatment EEG alterations with epilepsy recurrence are controversial. Due to the limitations of our article, further research is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Researchers have studied the risk factors for epilepsy recurrence among patients who withdraw from antiseizure medication (ASM). These studies aimed to determine the optimal time for ASM withdrawal. EEG findings are one of the risk factors that has been studied. However, it remains unclear whether abnormal pretreatment EEG findings are a risk factor for recurrence after ASM withdrawal. We performed this meta-analysis to clarify this issue.
Methods
We retrieved literature from the PubMed and Embase databases, and used the NewcastleOttawa Scale to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyse the data.
Results
In total,710 articles were retrieved from the databases. Ultimately, after screening, 11 articles involving 1686 patients with epilepsy were included. Compared with that for a normal EEG, the odds ratio (OR) for an abnormal EEG was 1.10 (P=0.50), with an I2 value of 32% (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that the children-to-adolescents subgroup had an OR of 1.21 (P=0.27), and the children-to-adults subgroup had an OR of 0.64 (P=0.14) for an abnormal EEG. A separate subgroup analysis revealed that the focal epilepsy subgroup had an OR of 1.30 (P=0.37), and the generalized epilepsy and focal epilepsy subgroup had an OR of 1.07 (P=0.67) for an abnormal EEG.
Conclusions
The risk of epilepsy recurrence is not related to pretreatment EEG findings, regardless of age or epilepsy classification. The associations of pre- and posttreatment EEG alterations with epilepsy recurrence are controversial. Due to the limitations of our article, further research is needed.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.