Immediate effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial.
Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano
{"title":"Immediate effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial.","authors":"Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano","doi":"10.1177/02692155241251844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; <i>p</i> < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1080-1090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241251844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.
Design: Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.
Setting: The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.
Participants: Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.
Intervention: The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.
Main measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.
Results: The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; p < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; p < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; p < 0.01) than in the placebo group.
Conclusion: The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.
目的比较冲击波疗法对慢性非特异性腰背痛患者的直接效果:随机安慰剂对照研究,分为三个干预组:本研究招募的患者于2022年5月至7月期间在基层医疗机构接受物理治疗:随机招募81名年龄在18-80岁、疼痛时间≥3个月、疼痛强度≥3级的慢性非特异性腰背痛患者参与研究:患者接受一次放射状冲击波治疗,放电2000次,能量100 mJ,频率5 Hz,使用凹面或凸面尖端或安慰剂治疗:主要指标:主要指标是干预后的疼痛强度。次要结果是压力痛阈值、疼痛的时间累加和功能表现。在基线和干预后收集数据:结果:凹面尖端组干预后的疼痛强度平均降低两点(95% CI = -3.6,-0.4;p p p p 结论:凹面冲击波疗法能有效减轻慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛和局部痛觉减退。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)