Are we closer to a standard of care for Richter's syndrome? Novel treatments on the horizon.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2024.2350528
Nghia Pham, Catherine C Coombs, Susan O'Brien
{"title":"Are we closer to a standard of care for Richter's syndrome? Novel treatments on the horizon.","authors":"Nghia Pham, Catherine C Coombs, Susan O'Brien","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2024.2350528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved over the past decade with dramatically improved outcomes with the introduction of targeted therapies. This unfortunately has not been the case for Richter transformation (RT), the histologic transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma, most typically diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). As such, RT continues to be one of the most challenging complications of CLL/SLL. Historically, RT has a poor response to treatment, with a minority reaching complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS) being less than a year.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The focus of this review is to discuss the effectiveness of commonly used regimens, and review existing data for emerging regimens being examined in ongoing clinical trials to improve prognosis and outcomes in patients with RT. Despite extensive efforts to optimize therapies for RT, there is still no generalized consensus on either first-line treatment regimens or regimens in the relapsed/refractory setting. RT continues to carry a high mortality rate without durable response to current therapeutic agents.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Ongoing and future research may identify novel treatment approaches that will eventually improve outcomes for patients with RT. The optimal care for RT patients is a clinical trial, when feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2024.2350528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved over the past decade with dramatically improved outcomes with the introduction of targeted therapies. This unfortunately has not been the case for Richter transformation (RT), the histologic transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma, most typically diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). As such, RT continues to be one of the most challenging complications of CLL/SLL. Historically, RT has a poor response to treatment, with a minority reaching complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS) being less than a year.

Areas covered: The focus of this review is to discuss the effectiveness of commonly used regimens, and review existing data for emerging regimens being examined in ongoing clinical trials to improve prognosis and outcomes in patients with RT. Despite extensive efforts to optimize therapies for RT, there is still no generalized consensus on either first-line treatment regimens or regimens in the relapsed/refractory setting. RT continues to carry a high mortality rate without durable response to current therapeutic agents.

Expert opinion: Ongoing and future research may identify novel treatment approaches that will eventually improve outcomes for patients with RT. The optimal care for RT patients is a clinical trial, when feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们离里希特综合征的治疗标准更近了吗?新疗法呼之欲出
导言:在过去十年中,慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(CLL/SLL)的治疗形势发生了显著变化,靶向疗法的引入大大改善了治疗效果。遗憾的是,里氏转化(RT)的情况并非如此,它是一种组织学上转化为更具侵袭性的淋巴瘤,最典型的是弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)。因此,RT 仍然是 CLL/SLL 最具挑战性的并发症之一。从历史上看,RT 的治疗反应不佳,只有少数患者能达到完全缓解(CR),总生存期(OS)不到一年:本综述的重点是讨论常用治疗方案的有效性,并回顾正在进行的临床试验中为改善 RT 患者的预后和疗效而研究的新兴治疗方案的现有数据。尽管为优化 RT 的治疗方法做出了大量努力,但对于一线治疗方案或复发/难治性治疗方案仍未达成普遍共识。RT的死亡率仍然很高,而且对目前的治疗药物没有持久的反应:正在进行的研究和未来的研究可能会发现新的治疗方法,最终改善 RT 患者的治疗效果。在可行的情况下,RT 患者的最佳治疗方法是进行临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
The impact of oral health promotion on the quality of life of children with bleeding disorders: fighting misconceptions. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin after lower-extremity revascularization. Current and emerging therapies as potential treatment for people with von Willebrand disease. Global prophylaxis trends in hemophilia: a macroeconomic analysis and its association with world development indicators. BCL-2 inhibition in acute myeloid leukemia: resistance and combinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1