Infant Oral Candidiasis and Bottle Cleaning Methods: A Descriptive Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SGA.0000000000000790
Patricia Stoltz, Tamara Bavousett
{"title":"Infant Oral Candidiasis and Bottle Cleaning Methods: A Descriptive Study.","authors":"Patricia Stoltz, Tamara Bavousett","doi":"10.1097/SGA.0000000000000790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As manufacturers produce bottles with additional parts, such as an anticolic straw, cleaning time increases. Increased cleaning time potentially decreases cleaning effectiveness and, thus, increases the chance for thrush. This study explored the relationship between the number of bottle parts and cleaning methods for bottle-fed-only infants (<13 months) presenting with oral candidiasis. After obtaining demographic information on eligible infants (via parental consent) from the chart, caregivers of 60 infants verbally completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire elicited information about the preferred bottle for feeding, number of parts, washing frequency, washing method, drying method, sterilization frequency, and sterilization method. The χ2 test, and Fisher's exact test when necessary, was performed to examine the relationship between each reported cleaning method (washing, drying, and sterilization) compared with the number of bottle parts (≤3 or ≥4). The number of bottle parts showed no association with bottle cleaning methods (p > .05). Although there were no statistically significant relationships, trends did present that warrant investigation. Future studies to confirm recommended practices for cleaning methods and identify those at risk from demographic data could positively affect the health of bottle-fed infants by reducing the occurrence of thrush.</p>","PeriodicalId":12666,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As manufacturers produce bottles with additional parts, such as an anticolic straw, cleaning time increases. Increased cleaning time potentially decreases cleaning effectiveness and, thus, increases the chance for thrush. This study explored the relationship between the number of bottle parts and cleaning methods for bottle-fed-only infants (<13 months) presenting with oral candidiasis. After obtaining demographic information on eligible infants (via parental consent) from the chart, caregivers of 60 infants verbally completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire elicited information about the preferred bottle for feeding, number of parts, washing frequency, washing method, drying method, sterilization frequency, and sterilization method. The χ2 test, and Fisher's exact test when necessary, was performed to examine the relationship between each reported cleaning method (washing, drying, and sterilization) compared with the number of bottle parts (≤3 or ≥4). The number of bottle parts showed no association with bottle cleaning methods (p > .05). Although there were no statistically significant relationships, trends did present that warrant investigation. Future studies to confirm recommended practices for cleaning methods and identify those at risk from demographic data could positively affect the health of bottle-fed infants by reducing the occurrence of thrush.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿口腔念珠菌病与奶瓶清洁方法:描述性研究
由于制造商生产的奶瓶带有更多的部件,例如反曲吸管,因此清洁时间会增加。清洁时间的增加可能会降低清洁效果,从而增加鹅口疮发生的几率。本研究探讨了纯奶瓶喂养婴儿的奶瓶部件数量与清洁方法之间的关系 ( .05)。虽然在统计学上没有明显的关系,但确实存在值得研究的趋势。未来的研究将确认推荐的清洁方法,并从人口统计学数据中识别高危人群,这将减少鹅口疮的发生,从而对奶瓶喂养婴儿的健康产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Nursing
Gastroenterology Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Nursing: The Official Leader in Science and Practice delivers the information nurses need to stay ahead in this specialty. The journal keeps gastroenterology nurses and associates informed of the latest developments in research, evidence-based practice techniques, equipment, diagnostics, and therapy. The only professional, peer-reviewed nursing journal covering this area, Gastroenterology Nursing is an invaluable resource for current SGNA guidelines, new GI procedures, pharmacology, career development, and certification review. Its lively editorial style and illustrations make the journal a pleasure to read and consult. Official Journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates and Canadian Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
期刊最新文献
Effects of Positive Psychological Interventions on Psychological Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Inflammation Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The Effect on Constipation of Abdominal Massage Applied to the Elderly in the Nursing Home: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Alleviates Severe PD-1 Inhibitor-Associated Colitis Caused by Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Case Report. Anxiety and Work Disability in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study From a Single Center. Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (RBL; REBYOTA ® ) for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: What Gastroenterology Nurses Need to Know.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1